| George Louis Reinhard - 1911 - 852 стор.
...v. Kearney (La.), 39 So. 967, discussed in 19 Harv. Law Rev. 540. "The distinction on which all the cases turn is this : If the person employed to do...specified terms, in a particular manner and for a stipulated price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist... | |
| William Francis Bailey - 1912 - 972 стор.
...contractor, the principal is or is not an independent contractor. The distinction upon which all the cases turn is this: If the person employed to do the...employer, by which he has agreed to do the work on specified terms in a particular manner and for a specified price, then the employer is not liable.... | |
| Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - 1915 - 986 стор.
...165. In Brackett v. Lubke, 4 Allen (Mass.) 138, Bigelow, CJ, said: "The distinction on which all the cases turn is this: If the person employed to do the...specified terms, in a particular manner and for a stipulated price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist... | |
| 1916 - 1226 стор.
...Lubke, 4 Allen (Mass.) 138, 81 Am. Dec. 694, Bigelow, a J., said: "The distinction on which all the cases turn is this: If the person employed to do the...contract with his employer by which he has agreed to dp the work on certain specified terms, in a particular manner, and for a stipulated price, then the... | |
| William Everett Britton, Ralph Stanley Bauer - 1922 - 1612 стор.
...Dec. 694, is also a leading case. The opinion states as follows: "The distinction on which all the cases turn is this : If the person employed to do...specified terms, in a particular manner, and for a stipulated price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist... | |
| Edwin Roulette Keedy - 1924 - 862 стор.
...was distinctly adjudicated in Sadler v. Henlock, 4 El. & Bl. 570. The distinction on which all the cases turn is this: If the person employed to do the...specified terms, in a particular manner and for a stipulated price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist... | |
| |