 | Montana. Supreme Court - 1895 - 662 стор.
...Allen, 138, is also a leading case. The opinion states as follows: "The distinction on which all the cases turn is this: If the person employed to do the...specified terms, in a particular manner, and for a stipulated price, then the employer is not liable. Tlie relation of master and servant does not subsist... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1902 - 942 стор.
...Allen, 140 [81 Am. Dec., 694], Bigelow, CJ, uses this language : " The distinction on which all the cases turn is this : If the person employed to do...specified terms, in a particular manner and for a stipulated price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist... | |
 | John Cassan Wait - 1897 - 1000 стор.
...that if the employee carries on an independent employment and acts in pursuance of a contract with the employer by which he has agreed to do the work on...specified price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist between the parties, but only that of contractor and... | |
 | John Cassan Wait - 1897 - 1022 стор.
...servants of an independent contractor.* The distinction made in many cases is, that if the employee carries on an independent employment and acts in pursuance of a contract with the employer by which he has agreed to do the work on certain specified terms, in a particular manner... | |
 | Frank Farnum Dresser - 1902 - 906 стор.
...control.105 The relation of master and servant does not exist between them, and the employer con«5 "If the person employed to do the work carries on...specified price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist between the parties, but only that of contractor and... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1903 - 1258 стор.
...servant. In BrackeM v. Lubke, 4 Allen, 138, Bigelow, CJ, says : " The distinction on which all the cases turn is this : If the person employed to do...specified price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist between the parties, but only that of contractor and... | |
 | 1904 - 928 стор.
...even for the negligent acts of his don.estic servants, such as his cook, coachman or gardener. . . . If the person employed to do the work carries on an...specified terms, in a particular manner, and for a stipulated price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1909 - 828 стор.
...specifying what was to be done and how: "' The distinction on which all cases turn is this: If the |)erson employed to do the work carries on an independent...specified price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist between the parties, but only that of contractor and... | |
 | 1909 - 1294 стор.
...latter, pursuant to a contract specifying what was to be done and how: "The distinction on which all the cases turn is this: If the person employed to do the...specified terms, in a particular manner, and for a stipulated price, then the employer is not liable. The relation of master and servant does not subsist... | |
 | Theophilus John Moll - 1910 - 452 стор.
...where it appears that the employment was general and not based on a contract to do a certain piece of work on certain specified terms in a particular manner and for a stipulated price. 212 There is considerable authority against the doctrine that the relation of master... | |
| |
The distinction on which all the cases turn is this: if the person employed to do the work carries on an independent employment, and acts in pursuance of a contract with his employer by which he has agreed to do the work on certain specified terms, in... 
