 | Milton Friedman - 1953 - 336 стор.
...justly ridiculed statement that "happily, there is nothing in the laws of value which remains [1848] for the present or any future writer to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete. "a7 The confusion between descriptive accuracy and analytical relevance has led not only to criticisms... | |
 | Milton Friedman - 1953 - 336 стор.
...justly ridiculed statement that "happily, there is nothing in the laws of value which remains [1848] for the present or any future writer to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete."27 The confusion between descriptive accuracy and analytical relevance has led not only to... | |
 | 1909 - 1132 стор.
...the question of value is fundamental. The smallest error on that subject infects with corresponding error all our other conclusions ; and anything vague...creates confusion and uncertainty in everything else.' Marx might have taken these words as his motto. They indicate the course of his whole train of reasoning.... | |
 | Maurice Dobb - 1975 - 308 стор.
...specifically Ricardian. Mill's treatment of the theory of value j is prefaced by the confident statement: "Happily there is nothing in the laws of Value which...to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete. "§ Here again he starts by claiming that he is doing no more than tidy up, expand a little and restate... | |
 | Thomas Sowell - 1994 - 174 стор.
..."Malthus' insignificant disputes about Value' "11S to his more celebrated statement of his later years: "Happily, there is nothing in the laws of Value which...future writer to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete."114 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The major substantive features of classical microeconomics revolved... | |
 | Phyllis Deane - 1978 - 260 стор.
...of which makes it the more surprising to find John Stuart Mill's famous statement in his Principles: 'Happily, there is nothing in the laws of value which...future writer to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete.'20 However, what this apparently complacent statement reflected was two things - first a... | |
 | T. W. Hutchison - 1978 - 376 стор.
...a certain piquancy coming, as they do, from one who twenty-two years previously had proclaimed that 'happily there is nothing in the laws of value which...for the present or any future writer to clear up'. These 'routine' economists, according to Mill, 'believe themselves to be provided with a set of catch-words,... | |
 | Elisabeth Jay, Richard Jay - 1986 - 282 стор.
...had seen Mill's statement in his final edition of the Principles that 'there is nothing in the law of value which remains for the present or any future...clear up: the theory of the subject is complete', also saw the economist, WS Jevons (1835-82), publish an open challenge to the Ricardo-Mill theory of... | |
 | Randy Pearl Albelda, Christopher Eaton Gunn, William Waller - 1987 - 362 стор.
...on which the whole system of classical ideas seemed to rest. Mill's well-known assertion—"Happily there is nothing in the laws of value which remains...to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete" 2 —still stood, unrcvised, in the 1871 edition of his Principles after the ground had evidently been... | |
 | Lawrence Goldman - 2003 - 220 стор.
...the spread of socialist opinions are pressing on'. 3 Whereas Mill's wildly incautious statement that 'happily there is nothing in the laws of value which...for the present or any future writer to clear up' acted as a spur to the ambitious and disaffected young Stanley Jevons, and later drew an embarrassed... | |
| |
Happily there is nothing in the laws of Value which remains for the present or any future writer to clear up ; the theory of the subject is complete. 
