 | United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee - 1957 - 818 стор.
...Mill, with all the abandon of true genius, wrote : "Happily, there is nothing in the laws of value which remains for the present or any future writer...that of so stating it as to solve by anticipation thf chief perplexities which occur in applying it : and to do this, some minuteness of exposition,... | |
 | Maurice Dobb - 1975 - 308 стор.
...theory of value j is prefaced by the confident statement: "Happily there is nothing in the laws of Value which remains for the present or any future writer...to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete. "§ Here again he starts by claiming that he is doing no more than tidy up, expand a little and restate... | |
 | Thomas Sowell - 1994 - 174 стор.
...to his more celebrated statement of his later years: "Happily, there is nothing in the laws of Value which remains for the present or any future writer to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete."114 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The major substantive features of classical microeconomics revolved... | |
 | Phyllis Deane - 1978 - 260 стор.
...John Stuart Mill's famous statement in his Principles: 'Happily, there is nothing in the laws of value which remains for the present or any future writer to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete.'20 However, what this apparently complacent statement reflected was two things - first a... | |
 | T. W. Hutchison - 1978 - 376 стор.
...who twenty-two years previously had proclaimed that 'happily there is nothing in the laws of value which remains for the present or any future writer to clear up'. These 'routine' economists, according to Mill, 'believe themselves to be provided with a set of catch-words,... | |
 | Elisabeth Jay, Richard Jay - 1986 - 282 стор.
...Mill's statement in his final edition of the Principles that 'there is nothing in the law of value which remains for the present or any future writer...clear up: the theory of the subject is complete', also saw the economist, WS Jevons (1835-82), publish an open challenge to the Ricardo-Mill theory of... | |
 | Randy Pearl Albelda, Christopher Eaton Gunn, William Waller - 1987 - 362 стор.
...ideas seemed to rest. Mill's well-known assertion—"Happily there is nothing in the laws of value which remains for the present or any future writer...to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete" 2 —still stood, unrcvised, in the 1871 edition of his Principles after the ground had evidently been... | |
 | F. A. Hayek - 1992 - 291 стор.
...weakest part of his system for the confident assertion that "there is nothing in the laws of value which remains for the present or any future writer to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete".'08 That this foundation of the whole edifice of economic theory was inadequate was only... | |
 | John K. Whitaker - 1990 - 318 стор.
...For Mill's unfortunate dictum see 1848-71, 2, p. 456. "Happily, there is nothing in the laws of Value which remains for the present or any future writer...clear up; the theory of the subject is complete". See also Principles, pp. 84-5, 90, 324-30, 348-9, 813-21; 1879<j, pp. 91-3, 147-8, 165-7. On the distinction... | |
 | Henry William Spiegel - 1991 - 904 стор.
...the theories of value and of monopoly. "Happily," he wrote, "there is nothing in the laws of value which remains for the present or any future writer...clear up; the theory of the subject is complete." This was written in 1848, when the Ricardian theory of value had already been challenged by the Oxford... | |
| |
Happily, there is nothing in the laws of Value which remains for the present or any future writer to clear up ; the theory of the subject is complete... 
