 | 1904 - 1332 стор.
...motion was denied. After verdict, the defendant moved for a new trial upon the ground, among others, that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that it was therefore perverse. This motion was denied. Judgment was awarded plaintiff for the amount of... | |
 | John Milton Gardner, Walter James Eagle - 1900 - 884 стор.
...interest thereon. The railroad company filed a motion for a ^new trial, the material grounds being that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the court erred in the charge, and the motion was overruled. The court thereupon rendered judgment against... | |
 | 1912 - 2044 стор.
...defendant, and against the plaintiff; and the plaintiff then moved for a new trial, upon the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the court erred in refusing to admit certain evidence, and in refusing to give certain instructions to... | |
 | 1912 - 1344 стор.
...There is no statement of facts. The only ground presented is in the motion for new trial, claiming that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence and that the court erred In his charge. The court gave a correct charge, clearly applicable to the complaint and... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1922 - 1018 стор.
...the verdict of the jury and award a new trial on the ground of misdirection of the jury by the court, that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the damages are excessive. Not only is the bill of particulars full enough to give the defendant notice... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1922 - 856 стор.
...the verdict of the jury and award a new trial on the ground of misdirection of the jury by the court, that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the damages are excessive. Not only is the bill of particulars full enough to give the defendant notice... | |
 | Virginia - 1927 - 334 стор.
...Trial. — In an action under this section, the facts and proceedings disclosed by the record, show that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that a new trial should have been awarded. Moon v. R & ARR Co., 78 Va. 745. Limitation of Action. — The... | |
 | 1927 - 960 стор.
...the testimony of two witnesses was offered to corroborate that claim. His contentions made here are that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the court erred in limiting the examination of certain of the state's witnesses. The identification of... | |
 | 1894 - 958 стор.
...contrary, it appears that the statements with all their details went to the jury before the defense opened. This was error. The third bill of exception...straight case,' and further stated and exclaimed, 'Why, John!' one or more times, when informed that one John Wilson was holding them; that by said conduct... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1878 - 742 стор.
...defendants for two thousand and five hundred dollars damages. A motion for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the jury were misdirected by the court, was overruled, and judgment entered on the verdict, to reverse which... | |
| |
... on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that "the jury, while considering the verdict herein, were improperly and unduly Influenced by the deputy in charge thereof, who stated to them 'that It was a plain case,... 
