| William Ellery Channing - 1845 - 436 стор.
...conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. ' ' If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God." — Vol. I. p. 23. Milton is not the first Christian 'who has thought to render the Supreme Being more... | |
| 1827 - 516 стор.
...to conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. " If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God." Vol. I. p. 23. Milton is not the first Christian, who has thought to 157 render the Supreme Being more... | |
| Andrews Norton - 1848 - 442 стор.
...Being. " If God," he asks, " habitually assigns to himself [in Scripture] the members and form of a man, why should we be afraid of attributing to him what he attributes to himself? " BI Ch. II. Such a question, proposed by one of the most enlightened minds of the seventeenth century,... | |
| William Ellery Channing - 1848 - 430 стор.
...conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. ' ' If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God." — Vol. I. p. 23. Milton is not the first Christian who has thought to render the Supreme Being more... | |
| William Ellery Channing - 1849 - 432 стор.
...to conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. " If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God." — Vol. I. p. 23. Milton is not the first Christian who has thought to render the Supreme Being more... | |
| George Balderston Kidd - 1852 - 694 стор.
...theologians should have recourse here to what they call anthropopathy"— ****•*• ," if f God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...ourselves, be considered as most complete and excellent "minister, should bless the lads. Some indeed contend that the angel hero " spoken of was not a created... | |
| John Milton - 1853 - 546 стор.
...and in chap. v. 3. " Adam begat a son in his own likeness, after his image") and if God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...ourselves be considered as most complete and excellent when imputed to God ? Questionless the glory and majesty of the Deity must have been so dear to him,... | |
| John Milton - 1853 - 322 стор.
...passions, and a human form. ' If (he says) God habitually assigns to himself the members and forms of a man, why should we be afraid of attributing to him what he attributes to himself? ' To which I presume the answer would be, that such expressions are used in the revelations of God's... | |
| Thomas Keightley - 1855 - 510 стор.
...and chap. v. 3, " Adam begat a son in his own likeness after his image," — and if God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God? .... To speak summarily, God either is or he is not such as he represents himself to be. If he be really... | |
| 1855 - 228 стор.
...John Milton, in writing on this subject, very truly remarks, " If God habitually, in his Word, assigns to himself the members and form of man, why should...what is imperfection and weakness, when viewed in referenee to ourselves, be considered as most complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God... | |
| |