 | William Ellery Channing - 1830 - 622 стор.
...to conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. ' If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God ? ' Vol. I. p. 23. Milton is not the first Christian, who has thought to render the Supreme Being more... | |
 | William Ellery Channing - 1830 - 630 стор.
...to conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. ' If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why should we be afraid of attributing to him what he aUributes to himself, so long as what is imperfection and weakness, when viewed in reference to ourselves,... | |
 | 1832 - 528 стор.
...passions, and a human form. If (he says) God habitually assigns to himself the members and form of a man, why should we be afraid of attributing to him what he attributes to himself • ' We must break in upon Mr. Mitford's clear explanation of Milton's belief, in order to say a few... | |
 | John Milton - 1832 - 328 стор.
...passions, and a human form. ' If (he says) God habitually assigns to himself the members and forms of a man, why should we be afraid of attributing to him what he attributes to himself.' To which I presume the answer would be, that such expressions are used in the revelations of God's... | |
 | William Ellery Channing - 1835 - 484 стор.
...to conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. " If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God?" Vol. I. p. 23. Milton is not the first Christian who has thought to render the Supreme Being more interesting... | |
 | Andrews Norton - 1844 - 432 стор.
...Being. " If God," he asks, " habitually assigns to himself [in Scripture] the members and form of a man, why should we be afraid of attributing to him what he atof his representations of matter as it existed in its primal state, it corresponded to the imaginary... | |
 | John Milton - 1838 - 518 стор.
...passions, and a human form. ' If (he says) God habitually assigns to himself the members and forms of a man, why should we be afraid of attributing to him what he attributes to himself?' To which I presume the answer would be, that such expressions are used in the revelations of God's... | |
 | Monthly literary register - 1839 - 720 стор.
...not only absurd but blasphemous to give to the Godhead hands at all. " If God," says he, " habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God ?" We are not disposed to quarrel with such as prefer to contemplate the Godhead in his abstract essence,... | |
 | William Ellery Channing - 1841 - 444 стор.
...to conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. " If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God." — Vol. I. p. 23. Milton is not the first Christian who has thought to render the Supreme Being more... | |
 | William Ellery Channing - 1843 - 686 стор.
...to conceive of the Supreme Being under the forms and affections of human nature. " If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why...complete and excellent whenever it is imputed to God ?" Vol. I. p. 23. Milton is not the first Christian who has thought to render the Supreme Being more... | |
| |
If God habitually assign to himself the members and form of man, why should we be afraid of attributing to him what he attributes to himself, so long as what is imperfection and weakness, when viewed in reference to ourselves, be considered as most complete... 
