 | Nicholas Bourne - 1998 - 318 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
 | Douglas Smith - 1999 - 322 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
 | Simon Goulding - 1999 - 430 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
 | A. B. Levy - 2003 - 472 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
 | MIchael Ottley - 2002 - 158 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
 | Roman Tomasic, Stephen Bottomley, Rob McQueen - 2002 - 893 стор.
...matter requiring the board's consideration. The business of a corporation could not go on if directors could not trust those who are put into a position...express purpose of attending to details of management . . . Reliance would only be unreasonable where the director was aware of circumstances of such a character,... | |
 | Geoffrey Gibson - 2003 - 214 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
 | Petri Mäntysaari - 2005 - 445 стор.
...inferior officers ... or verifying the calculations of the auditor himself. The business of life could not go on if people could not trust those who are...express purpose of attending to details of management." In the 1990s, it was accepted by Hoffmann LJ first in Norman v Theodore Goddard°m (as Hoffmann J)... | |
 | Christian Campbell - 2007 - 364 стор.
...the auditors himself. The business of life could not go on if people could not trust those who are in a position of trust for the express purpose of attending to details of management.198 Summary The cases illustrate that a director is not obliged to attend every meeting... | |
| |
The business of life could not go on if people could not trust those who are put into a position of trust for the express purpose of attending to details of management. 
