 | John Cunningham Wood - 1993 - 872 стор.
...presumption, therefore, in kings and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expense, either by sumptuary laws,...in the society. Let them look well after their own expence. and they may safely trust private people with theirs. If their own extravagance does not ruin... | |
 | John Cunningham Wood - 1993 - 344 стор.
...Wealth, pp. 325-27] He saw kings and ministers as "... the greatest spendthrifts in the society ... If their own extravagance does not ruin the state, that of their own subjects never will." [Smith, Wealth, p. 329] It is deplorable that today his comment still rings... | |
 | Karl Marx - 1986 - 354 стор.
...presumption, therefore, in kings and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expense, either by sumptuary laws,...does not ruin the State, that of their subjects never will ([Wealth of Nations], t. II, 1. II, ch. Ill, ed. McCulloch, p. 122). And once more the following... | |
 | François Gauthier - 1990 - 548 стор.
...kings and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people [...] They are themsclves always, and without any exception, the greatest spendthrifts...does not ruin the state, that of their subjects never will9. Pour Smith, l'enrichissement à long terme d'un pays dépend de la présence de la main invisible,... | |
 | R. H. Coase - 1994 - 234 стор.
...ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expence. . . . They are themselves always, and without any exception,...in the society. Let them look well after their own expence, and they may safely trust private people with theirs. If their own extravagance does not ruin... | |
 | Douglas A. Irwin - 1998 - 290 стор.
...therefore, in kings and ministers, to pretend to watch over the oeconomy of private people, and to restrain their expense either by sumptuary laws, or...they may safely trust private people with theirs. lf their own extravagance does not ruin the state, that of their subjects never will" (ll.iii.36).... | |
 | Joyce Oldham Appleby - 1996 - 578 стор.
...and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expence, either by sumptuary laws, or by prohibiting the importation...in the society. Let them look well after their own expence, and they may safely trust private people with theirs. If their own extravagance does not ruin... | |
 | Peter Gay - 1996 - 756 стор.
...ministers, to pretend to watch over the oeconomy of private people, and to restrain their expence, either by sumptuary laws, or by prohibiting the importation of foreign luxuries." Kant could have said the same thing. Are not the great themselves "always, and without any exception,... | |
 | Donald Rutherford - 1999 - 518 стор.
...presumption therefore in kings and ministers to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expense, either by sumptuary laws,...luxuries. They are themselves always, and without exception, the greatest spendthrifts in the society. Let them look well after their own expense, and... | |
| |
It is the highest impertinence and presumption, therefore, in kings and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expense, either by sumptuary laws, or by prohibiting the importation of foreign luxuries.... 
