| Westel Woodbury Willoughby - 1910 - 804 стор.
...hold that, in the absence of congressional permission to do so, the State had no power to interfere, by seizure or any other action, in prohibition of...importation and sale by the foreign or non-resident importer."32 In Schollenberger r. Pennsylvania33 the original package test was applied to interstate... | |
| Thomas Carl Spelling - 1912 - 332 стор.
...as the distinction exists, it must be worked out as the cases arise." LEISY v. HARDIN (135 US, 125): "Whatever our individual views may be as to the deleterious...or dangerous qualities of particular articles, we can not hold that any articles which Congress recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1912 - 384 стор.
...Congress »s well as by the commercial world as ' subjects df exchange, barter, and traffic,' and that ' whatever our individual views may be as to the deleterious...or dangerous qualities of particular articles, we can not hold that any articles which Congress recognized as subjects of commerce are not such.' " Then... | |
| Marion Mills Miller - 1913 - 504 стор.
...GRAY [Del.]. — I observe in the opinion of the Supreme Court upon this case there is this language : Whatever our individual views may be as to the deleterious...or dangerous qualities of particular articles, we can not hold that any articles which Congress recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not... | |
| James Parker Hall - 1914 - 528 стор.
...hold that, in the absence of congressional permission to do so, the state had no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not -such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by state laws amounting to regulations,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate Commerce - 1914 - 330 стор.
...we hold that in the absence of congressional permission to do so the State had no power to interfere by seizure or any other action in prohibition of importation...and sale by the foreign or nonresident importer." In Bowman v. Chicago, etc., Railway (125 II. S., 465, 493), also decided before the passage of the... | |
| Harold Edgar Barnes - 1915 - 376 стор.
...hold that in the absence of congressional permission to do so, the State had no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by State laws amounting to regulations,... | |
| Eugene Wambaugh - 1915 - 1106 стор.
...JStateJiadno power to interfere by seizure, or any otheFaction, in prohibjtion_o.f_inip't>rtnT tion_and sale by the foreign or non-resident importer. Whatever...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by State laws amounting to regulations,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1918 - 1104 стор.
...action, in prohibition of importation 25] and sale by the foreign nonresident importer. Whatever pur Individual views may be as to the deleterious or dangerous...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by state laws amounting to regulations,... | |
| Robert Eugene Cushman - 1920 - 180 стор.
...it ceases to be an article of interstate commerce it is beyond the reach of the state police power. "Whatever our individual views may be as to the deleterious or dangerous qualities of particular articles [said the court] we cannot hold that any articles which Congress recognizes as subjects of interstate... | |
| |