 | Catherine E. Ingrassia, Jeffrey S. Ravel - 2005 - 364 стор.
...labor, as when he famously declares that the poor have a right to food that they themselves produce: No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of...miserable. It is but equity, besides, that they who feed, cloath and lodge the whole body of the people, should have a share of the produce of their own labour... | |
 | John E. Schwarz - 2005 - 278 стор.
...claim. No less a free-market advocate than Adam Smith himself had this to say: "It is but equity . . . that they who feed, clothe and lodge the whole body...should have such a share of the produce of their own labor as to be themselves tolerably well fed, clothed and lodged."68 In using the word tolerably, by... | |
 | Daniel Rauhut, Neelambar Hatti, Carl-Axel Olsson - 2005 - 362 стор.
...sum, according to Smith, economic growth is the key to the wealth of nations (Hollander 1973). Since "[n]o society can surely be flourishing and happy,...greater part of the members are poor and miserable" (Smith 2000b, p. 90), economic growth will also be an important mean of fighting poverty. Smith on... | |
 | Alessandro Roncaglia - 2006 - 596 стор.
...favour of the lower classes were not only 'just' but also important to favouring economic development: 'No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of...greater part of the members are poor and miserable' (Smith 1776, p. 96; quoted in Rothschild 1995, p. 714). Let us recall (cf. above, § 5.8) that Condorcet... | |
 | John E. Ikerd - 2005 - 228 стор.
...improves the circumstances of the greater part can never be regarded as an inconvenience to the whole. No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of...which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable."5 For his part, Malthus suggested that population growth would ultimately outstrip our ability... | |
 | Raymond W. Baker - 2005 - 288 стор.
...inevitable and tolerable, is the opposite outcome from what he hoped would arise. "No society," he said, "can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable."16 Smith's vision has been largely set aside, and instead capitalism has drawn its sustaining... | |
 | David Clark - 2006 - 757 стор.
...improves the circumstances of the greater part can never be regarded as an inconveniency to the whole. No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of...miserable. It is but equity, besides, that they who feed, cloath, and lodge the whole body of the people, should have such a share of the produce of their own... | |
 | Knud Haakonssen - 2006 - 442 стор.
...ranks of the people" is of advantage "to the society. " Such an improvement was a matter of justice: "No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of...miserable. It is but equity, besides, that they who feed, cloath and lodge the whole body of the people, should have such a share of the produce of their own... | |
 | Beate Jahn - 2006 - 290 стор.
...previous forms of society. Indeed, this is the key criterion by which to assess contemporary society: No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of...miserable. It is but equity, besides, that they who feed, cloath and lodge the whole body of the people, should have such a share of the produce of their own... | |
 | Philip A. Klein - 2006 - 428 стор.
...could hold a candle to such a feat. Smith's role for his invisible hand was more modest. He also wrote, 'No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of...greater part of the members are poor and miserable' (1776/1985, p. 80). Judging whether society is flourishing and happy is clearly, therefore, more than... | |
| |
No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable. 
