 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 848 стор.
...that " in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the onus of proof... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1885 - 218 стор.
...that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the onus of proof... | |
 | 1885 - 1232 стор.
...that "in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the onus of proof... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - 1885 - 804 стор.
...the evidence is left to the jury, there may be in every case a preliminary question for the presiding judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly lind a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof is imposed.... | |
 | 1890 - 1166 стор.
...evidence does not admit of conflicting inferences relating to the point in question. Moreover, the rule is "not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properiy proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the onus of proof... | |
 | 1906 - 1172 стор.
...that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary inestion for the judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to rind a verdict for the party producing it upon whom the onus of proof... | |
 | 1886 - 956 стор.
...that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the onus of proof... | |
 | 1909 - 1164 стор.
...before the evidence is left to the jury, there is or may be in every case a preliminary question for the judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof... | |
 | 1887 - 956 стор.
...both in England and in this country, there is a preliminary question, in all cases, for the court, not whether there is literally no evidence, "but whether there is any that ought reasonably to satisfy the jury that the fact sought to be found is established. If there... | |
 | 1911 - 1338 стор.
...authorize and sustain a verdict, but it seems to be now settled law that the question for the judge "is, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any that ought reasonably to satisfy the jury that the fact sought to be proved is established." [5] Upon... | |
| |
... that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether there Is literally no evidence, but whether there Is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party... 
