 | Karl Knies - 1885 - 466 стор.
...sondern ') The ^previously) accumulated stock of the produce of labour is termed capital — Money is no more synonymous with capital than it is with wealth. Money cannot in itself perform any part of the offlce of capital, since it can afford no assistance to production. To do this it must be exchanged... | |
 | Cyrus C. Camp - 1888 - 272 стор.
...this misapprehension would be to repeat what has been said in the introductory chapter. Money is no more synonymous with capital than it is with wealth....since it can afford no assistance to production." Nevertheless, the habit of classing money as capital has gone on until everyone seems to think it ought... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 1892 - 628 стор.
...this misapprehension, would be to repeat what has been said in the introductory chapter. Money is no more synonymous with capital than it is with wealth....perform any part of the office of capital, since it can affbrct no assistance to production. To do this, it must be exchanged for other things ; and anything,... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 1894 - 644 стор.
...this misapprehension, would be to repeat what has been said in the introductory chapter. Money is no more synonymous with capital than it is with wealth. Money cannot in itself perform any part of the cilice of capital, since it can afford no assistance to production. To do this, it must be exchanged... | |
 | F. U. Laycock - 1895 - 408 стор.
...such conversion. Money in itself could not perform any part of the office of capital, but, said Mill, "anything which is susceptible of being exchanged...of contributing to production in the same degree." For example he might have added, " A sieve bottomed with brass wire gauze is susceptible of being exchanged... | |
 | Arthur James Ogilvy - 1898 - 288 стор.
...mind of the capitalist and not in the nature of the article, and saying that anything which can be exchanged for other things is capable of contributing to production in the same degree as those other things, he clearly lost sight for the moment of the difference, the enormous difference,... | |
 | Arthur James Ogilvy - 1898 - 340 стор.
...mind of the capitalist and not in the nature of the article, and saying that anything which can be exchanged for other things is capable of contributing to production in the same degree as those other things, he clearly lost sight for the moment of the difference, the enormous difference,... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 1899 - 630 стор.
...this misapprehension, would be to repeat what has been said in the introductory chapter. Money is no more synonymous with capital than it is with wealth....of contributing to production in the same degree. AVbat capital does for production, is to afford the shelter, protection, tools and materials which... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 1900 - 506 стор.
...introductory chapter. Money is no more synonymous with capital than it is with wealth. Money cannot itself perform any part of the office of capital,...production. To do this it must be exchanged for other thing's; and anything which is susceptible of being exchanged for other things is capable of contributing... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 1904 - 626 стор.
...this misapprehension, would be to repeat what has been said in the introductory chapter. Money is no more synonymous with capital than it is with wealth....contributing to production in the same degree. What capital doea for production, is to afford the «heiter protection, tools and materials whic! the work requires,... | |
| |
Money is no more synonymous with capital than it is with wealth. Money cannot in itself perform any part of the office of capital, since it can afford no assistance to production. 
