 | John Stuart Mill - 1998 - 516 стор.
...general policy of laissez-faire with respect to economic activities: 'Laissez-faire . . . should be the general practice: every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is a certain evil'.70 But significant 'departures' from the general policy are also said to be expedient. Recognizing... | |
 | Keith Culver - 1999 - 580 стор.
...who resist but on those who recommend government interference. Letting alone, in short, should be the general practice: every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is a certain evil. In short, we get a presumption, not an absolute prohibition. The question is why doesn't the argument... | |
 | Dan E. Beauchamp, Bonnie Steinbock - 1999 - 399 стор.
...who resist but on those who recommend government interference. Letting alone, in short, should be the general practice: every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is a certain evil. In short, we get a presumption not an absolute prohibition. The question is, why doesn't the argument... | |
 | Kenneth O. Morgan - 2000 - 724 стор.
...handbook of midVictorian liberalism, put the point in a nutshell: 'Laisser-faire, in short, should be the general practice: every departure from it, unless...required by some great good, is a certain evil.' The presumption was that the State should stand aside. The division which Mill and others made between... | |
 | 2000 - 724 стор.
...source of all progress, and should be jealously defended.1 " Laisser-faire, in short, should be the general practice; every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is a certain evil." But Mill allows a great place for government activity. Utility is the only test: if the greatest good... | |
 | K. Theodore Hoppen - 1998 - 818 стор.
...''laissez-faire' as a 'practical rule' was 'incomparably the safer guide'. For JS Mill it should 'be the general practice: every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is a certain evil'.6 But Mill himself soon admitted a burgeoning army of 'exceptions' concerning child protection,... | |
 | Nigel Warburton, Jonathan E. Pike, Derek Matravers - 2000 - 416 стор.
...who resist but those who recommend government interference. Letting alone, in short, should be the general practice: every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is certain evil. In short, we get a presumption, not an absolute prohibition. The question is why doesn't... | |
 | 1992 - 260 стор.
...proposed substitutes.34 His ideas may be summed up in the sentence "Laisser-faire, in short, should be the general practice: every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is a certain evil."35 Mill was quite sure that there were occasions when such departures were in fact justified.... | |
 | Barbara H. Fried - 2009 - 350 стор.
...JS Mill in Book V of Principles of Political Economy. "Laisser-faire," declared Mill, "should be the general practice; every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is a certain evil,"69 and then proceeded to enumerate the many great goods to be accomplished by broad government... | |
 | Barry Knight, Hope Bagyendera Chigudu, Rajesh Tandon - 2012 - 233 стор.
...over the minds of economists. The essence of his view was (Mill, 1848): Laissez faire should be the general practice: every departure from it, unless...required by some great good, is a certain evil. The Wall Street Crash of 1929, followed by the Great Depression of the 1930s, had caused so much pain and... | |
| |
Letting alone, in short, should be the general practice: every departure from it, unless required by some great good, is a certain evil. 
