| Gerald M. Meier - 1985 - 278 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
| 1985 - 212 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
| Karl Marx - 1986 - 354 стор.
...when eg J. St. Mill says (Principles of Political Economy, 2nd ed., London, 1849, Vol. I, p. 240): The laws and conditions of the production of wealth partake of the character of physical truths ... It is not so with the distribution of wealth. That is a matter of human institutions solely.' (p.... | |
| Cy Gonick - 1987 - 442 стор.
...modified. This distinction, it turned out, was to be Mill's most enduring contribution to economics. "The laws and conditions of the production of wealth partake...truths. There is nothing optional or arbitrary in them," Mill declared, "It is not so with the Distribution of Wealth. That is a matter of human institution... | |
| John Cunningham Wood - 2004 - 1132 стор.
...not the industrial mode of production. He takes as an example John Stuart Mill's statement that "the laws and conditions of the production of wealth partake of the character of physical truths It is not so with the distribution of wealth. That is a matter of human institutions solely."3 Marx... | |
| Bruce Mazlish - 1988 - 524 стор.
...and highly significant division. "The laws and conditions of the production of wealth," he tells us, "partake of the character of physical truths. There is nothing optional, or arbitrary in them." Distribution, however, is another affair: "Thar is a matter of human institution solely." In this area,... | |
| Makoto Itoh, Makoto Itō - 1988 - 468 стор.
...work was the contrast between the theory of production and that of distribution. According to him 'the laws and conditions of the production of wealth partake of the character of physical truth', whereas the distribution of wealth is 'a matter of human institution solely'.17 These contrasting... | |
| |