| Michael Novak - 1984 - 316 стор.
...always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It is the original inheritance...When private property in land is not expedient, it is unjust.22 For Adam Smith, "the cause of the wealth of nations" is intelligence, research, and discovery,... | |
| Gerald F. Gaus - 1990 - 564 стор.
...always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It is the original inheritance of the whole species. ... It is no hardship to anyone to be excluded from what others have produced: they were not bound... | |
| 1992 - 364 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
| Thomas C. Holt - 1992 - 556 стор.
...interesting tension with his bolder rhetoric. "No man made the land," he wrote in Political Economy. "It is the original inheritance of the whole species....property in land is not expedient, it is unjust." But what constitutes socially justifiable "expediency"? It is expedient, he replied, to treat real... | |
| Pierre Guillet de Monthoux - 1993 - 334 стор.
...that the laws of inheritance should be reformed but also that land itself should never be owned: "No man made the land. It is the original inheritance...When private property in land is not expedient, it is unjust."34 It was also wrong to own a public appointment or profession. Together with the earth, such... | |
| Herman E. Daly - 1994 - 548 стор.
...it ceases to be defensible, and the time has come for making some new arrangement of the matter. No man made the land. It is the original inheritance...private property in land is not expedient it is unjust. . . . The claim of the landowners to the land is altogether subordinate to the general policy of the... | |
| Martin Crick - 1994 - 370 стор.
[ Відображення вмісту сторінки заборонено ] | |
| |