| Arizona. Legislative Assembly - 1885 - 978 стор.
...person. This principle is expressly embodied in Section ten (10), Article one (1), of the Constitution of the United States, which declares that "no State shall * * * pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." It has been contended that this provision of the Constitution... | |
| Samuel Jones Tilden - 1885 - 852 стор.
...applied for would divest them. Such an act would be repugnant to the provision of the Constitution of the United States which declares that " no State shall pass any ex post facto law." It would violate private rights, and trample upon the clearest dictates of natural... | |
| 1886 - 902 стор.
...existing contracts, will the act conflict with that clause of section 10, article 1, of the constitution of the United States, which declares that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts? What constitutes such a law? A few years ago the legislature... | |
| 1897 - 1164 стор.
...breach of a contract than this would be. In order to come within the provision of the constitution of the United States, which declares that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts, not only must the obligation of a contract have been impaired,... | |
| 1886 - 848 стор.
...contracts within the meaning and grasp of the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States, which declares that "no state shall pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts," the act of 1812,... | |
| 1888 - 1048 стор.
...acted and invested its capital, is a contract within the protection of that clause of the constitution of the United States which declares that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts; and this contract was not affected by the provision of section... | |
| Joseph Edward Turner - 1888 - 600 стор.
...of trustees abolished without violating the tenth section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States, which declares that no State shall pass any ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts. Another serious objection made against... | |
| North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1889 - 904 стор.
...to sell or dispose of the land in question, without contravening that provision of the Constitution of the United States which declares that no -State shall pass any " law impairing the obligation of con387 GILMORE r. BRIGHT. tracts." Con. US, Art. I, Sec. 10. Unless a person... | |
| |