 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1899 - 788 стор.
...exaiiiinable at law. And in Patterson v. Winn (11 Wheat., 38(t) the court speaking on the same subject said: We may therefore assume, as the settled doctrine of this court, that if a pateut is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited... | |
 | Thomas Johnson Michie - 1907 - 988 стор.
...Patterson v. Winn, 11 Wheat. 380; Whittington v. Christian, 2 Rand. 353; Warwick v. Norvell, 1 Rob. 308." "'If a patent is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the state had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in a court of... | |
 | 1918 - 1212 стор.
...conveyance of them would be inoperative and void. * • * We may therefore assume as the settled doctrine that if a patent is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuance thereof was without authority or was prohibited by statute, or the state had no title, it... | |
 | California. District Courts of Appeal - 1917 - 1108 стор.
...attempted conveyance of them would be inoperative and void We may therefore assume as the settled doctrine that if a patent is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuance thereof was without authority or was prohibited by statute, or the state had no title, it... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 926 стор.
...granted was not in the grantor at the time oí the grant no estate passes to the grantee. If a patent IB absolutely void upon Its face, or the Issuing thereof...prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, It muy be Impeached collaterally lu a court of law In an action oí ejectment. The rule Is as applicable... | |
 | 1918 - 934 стор.
...conveyance of them would be inoperative and void. . . . We may therefore assume as the settled doctrine that if a patent is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuance thereof was without authority or was prohibited by statute, or the state had no title, it... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 774 стор.
...the settled doctrine of the Supreme Court of the United States, that if a patent granted by a State is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in a Court of... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 798 стор.
...own statutes. In Patterson v. Winn, 11 Wheat. 1380, the Supreme Court of the United States said : " We may; therefore, assume, as the settled doctrine...face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in n Court of... | |
| |
We may, therefore, assume as the settled doctrine of this Court, that if a patent is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may be impeached collaterally... 
