 It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the...  American Law Reports Annotated - Сторінка 4811919Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
 | 1920 - 1206 стор.
...must appear that the injury, not necessarily the precise actual inJury, but some like injury, "was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen In the light of the attending circumstances." Milwaukee Ry. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 U. 8. 469, 24 L. Ed. 256 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Bigham, 90 Tex. 223,... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1887 - 792 стор.
...wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, is not warranted unless it appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. Where there is no intermediate efficient cause, the original wrong must be considered as reaching to... | |
 | 1912 - 1344 стор.
...amounting to wanton wrong, Is the proximate cause of an injury, It must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances." This, say our own Supreme Court, in the case of T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Bigham,... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1887 - 1104 стор.
...it appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negHAdams v. Young. gence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. Where there is no intermediate efficient cause, the original wrong must be considered as reaching to... | |
 | 1927 - 1232 стор.
...an Injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances, still it Is not necessary that the particular Injury should have been foreseen,... | |
 | 1911 - 1320 стор.
...injury; that is, the negligent act must have been the natural and probable cause of the injury, which ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Negligence. Cent. Dig. §§ 217-220, 224-228; Dec. Dig. § 121.»... | |
 | 1901 - 1044 стор.
...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that It was such аз might or ought to have been foreseen. In the light of the attending circumstances." 16 Am. & Eng. Ene. Law, 436. Now, by the rules of the company In proof, cars left on sidings are required... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1911 - 700 стор.
...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." Milwaukee, etc., Ry. Co. v. Kellogg, supra. Our court said, in Gage v. Harvey, 66 Ark. 68: "In determining... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1928 - 1120 стор.
...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. It is well known that time is an important factor in modern business. Where a shipment of shingles... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1913 - 694 стор.
...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. Milwaukee, etc., Ry. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 476, 24 L. Ed. 256; Gage v, Harvey, 66 Ark. 68; St. Louis,... | |
| |
