 | Francis Wharton - 1884 - 882 стор.
...and an opportunity to be heard. It matters not, upon the question of the constitutionality of such law, that the assessment has in fact been fairly apportioned. The constitutional validity of a law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but what may by its authority be done. The... | |
 | 1919 - 926 стор.
...be done under its authority. In the case of Ulman v. Baltimore, 72 Md. 587, 20 Atl. 141, 11 LRA 224, the court said: "It matters not, upon the question...tests must be applied to ordinances. Hagerstown v. B. & ORR Co., 107 Md. 178, 68 Atl. 490, 126 Am. St Rep. 382; Curtis v. Mactier, 115 Md. 386, 80 Atl.... | |
 | 1891 - 1132 стор.
...be deprived, and he may appeal to it, whatever others may think as to the result of such an appeal. "It matters not, upon the question of the constitutionality...what has been done under it, but by what may by its author* ity be done." Stuart v. Palmer, supra. But we do not admit that, had notice been given the... | |
 | 1909 - 1152 стор.
...law and of construction as are applicable thereto. The validity of the contract should be determined not by what has been done under it, but by what may be done under it, by what will be Its real tendency with reference to trade and monopoly when In full... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1888 - 766 стор.
...law must require notice to them, and give them a right to a hearing, and an opportunity to be heard. It matters not, upon the question of the constitutionality...under it, but by what may by its authority be done. The legislature may prescribe the kind of notice, and the mode in which it shall be given, but it cannot... | |
 | 1904 - 1246 стор.
...law must require notice to them, and give them the right to a hearing and an opportunity to be heard. It matters not, upon the question of the constitutionality...apportioned. The constitutional validity of law is to be decided, not by what has been done under it, but by what may by its authority be done. The Legislature... | |
 | 1905 - 1266 стор.
...constitutionality of such law, that the questions involved have been fairly decided. The essential validity of the law is to be tested not by what has been done under it, but by what may by its authority be done. Stuart v. Palmer, supra ; Oilman v. Tucker, 128 NY 190, 200, 28 NE 1040, 13 LRA 304, 26 Am. St. Rep.... | |
 | 1906 - 1270 стор.
...bear in mind the principle firmly established in this state that the constitutional validity of the law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but what may under its authority be done. Stuart v. Palmer, 74 NY 183, 30 Am. Rep. 289. If a tax of two... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Hiram Edward Sickels - 1888 - 834 стор.
...v. Potts, 79 Penn. St. 164, 168 ; Wijnehamer v. People, 13 XY 378.) The constitutional validity of a law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but what may, xmder its authority, be done. (Stewart v. Palmer, 74 N". Y. 183, 188.) Article 3, section... | |
 | Delaware. Court of Chancery - 1889 - 680 стор.
...must require notice to them, and give to them a right to a hearing and an opportunity to be heard. It matters not, upon the question of the constitutionality...assessment has in fact been fairly apportioned. The con5 DEL. CH. 35 Opinion: the doctrine in New York. stitutional validity of law is to be tested, not... | |
| |
The constitutional validity of law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but by what may, by its authority, be done. 
