 Such agents have duties to discharge of a fiduciary nature towards their principal, and it is a rule of universal application, that no one having such duties to discharge shall be allowed to enter into engagements in which he has or can have a personal...  American Law Reports Annotated - Сторінка 4521924Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
 | Stephan Festner - 2006 - 316 стор.
...universal application, that no one, having [fiduciary] duties to discharge, shall be allowed to enter into engagements in which he has, or can have, a personal...the interests of those whom he is bound to protect ..." 192 Siehe insbesondere New Zealand Netherlands Society "Oranje" Inc. v. Kuys [1973] l WLR 1126,... | |
 | Philip R. Wood - 2007 - 493 стор.
...allowed to enter into an engagement in which he has, or can have, a personal interest conflicting with or which may possibly conflict with the interests of those whom he is bound to protect". The possibility of the conflict is increased where the fiduciary has large discretionary powers as... | |
 | Christian Campbell - 2007 - 398 стор.
...into engagements in which he has or can have a personal interest conflicting or which possibly may conflict with the interests of those whom he is bound to protect. The rule is strictly applied, being a stark reminder of the frailty of human nature. As explained by... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1861 - 614 стор.
...which Gardner v. Ogden. he has, or can have, a personal interest conflicting, or which possibly may conflict, with the interests of those whom he is bound to protect So strictly is this principle adhered to, that no question is allowed to be raised as to the fairness... | |
 | Australia. High Court - 1916 - 744 стор.
...into engagements in which he has, or can have, a personal interest conflicting, or which possibly mmJ conflict, with the interests of those whom he is bound, to protect. So strictly is this principle adhered to, that no question is allowed to be raised as to the fairness... | |
| |
