...when there is any competent proof of the charges made, authorized to review the facts and determine whether there was ' ' upon all the evidence, such...existence of any of those facts, that the verdict of a jury affirming the existence thereof, rendered in an action in the Supreme Court, triable by jury,...

...affecting the rights of iho parties thereto, has been violated, to the prejudice оГ the relator, reupon take the same proceedings, preoonderance of proof, against the existence of any of those facts, that the verdict of a jury, affirming...

...law, affecting the rights of the parties thereto, has been violated, to the prejudice of the relator, 4. Whether there was any competent proof of all the...5. If there was such proof, whether there was. upon nil the evidence, such a preponderance of proof, against the existence of any of those facts, th.'it...

...to be proved to authorize the making of the determination, and we are not able to say that there was such a preponderance of proof against the existence of any of those facts that If'the determination was based upon the verdict of a jury affirming the existence thereof, we would...

...has been violated, to the prejudice of the relator, 4. Whether there was any competent proof of nil the facts, necessary to be proved, in order to authorize...preponderance of proof, against the existence of any of those fncts, that the verdict of a jury, affirming the existence thereof, rendered in an action in the supreme...

...common law, — jurisdiction, regularity of proceedings, and errors of law, — the court may decide whether there was any competent proof of all the facts necessary to be proved to authorize the making of the determination, and if there was such proof, whether there is upon all...

...the questions of jurisdiction, procedure, and violations of rules of law, the question before us is whether there was any competent proof of all the facts necessary to be proved in order to authorize the determination, and, if there were such proof, whether there was such a preponderance of proof against...

...fi«»jjL»Jt^ the rights of the parties thereto, has been violated, to the prejudice *^ of the relator; 4. Whether there was any competent proof of all the...existence of any of those facts, that the verdict of a jury, affirming the existence thereof, rendered in an action in the Supreme Court, triable by a jury,...

...parties thereto, has been violated, to the prejudice of the relator, 4. Whether there was any compétent proof of all the facts, necessary to be proved, in order to authorize the making of the determin ation. 5. If there was such proof, whether there was, upon all the evidence, such a preoonderance...

...thereafter were violated to the prejudice of the petitioner; second, that there was no competent proof of the facts necessary to be proved in order to authorize the making of such decision, and that the evidence was wholly insufficient and improper to convict the petitioner...