 sacredness of property" is talked of, it should always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It is the original inheritance of the whole species. Its appropriation is wholly...  Principles of Social Science - Сторінка 169автори: Henry Charles Carey - 1859Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
 | Gerald F. Gaus - 1999 - 268 стор.
...guarantee to individuals of the fruits of their own labour and abstinence."16 However, Mill added: When the "sacredness of property" is talked of, it should always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It... | |
 | David L. Sills, Robert King Merton - 2000 - 466 стор.
...Communism would be but as dust in the balance. Principles of Political Economy (1848) 1965:Book 2, 207. No man made the land. It is the original inheritance of the whole species. Its appropriation is wholly a question of general expediency. When private property in land is not... | |
 | Manuel García Pazos - 1999 - 268 стор.
...„When the „sacredness of properly" is talked of, it should always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. 1t is the original inheritance of the whole species. Its appropriation is wholly a question of general... | |
 | Bruce L. Kinzer - 2001 - 316 стор.
...propounded a conception of landed property Cairnes could not possibly transcend. There Mill had written: 'No man made the land. It is the original inheritance of the whole species. Its appropriation is wholly a question of expediency. When private property in land is not expedient,... | |
 | Max Beer - 2002 - 468 стор.
...of property, he thought, was an expediency ; it was not as " sacred " as property in movables, for " no man made the land ; it is the original inheritance of the whole species." l Rent he considered -to be the effect of a natural monopoly and a fit subject of special taxation.... | |
 | Manuel García Pazos - 1999 - 268 стор.
...am Herzen. Mill teilt diese Ansicht aufgrund seines Ansatzes von der Nützlichkeit nicht unbedingt: „When the „sacredness of property" is talked of, it should always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It... | |
 | Terry L. Anderson, Fred S. McChesney - 2003 - 412 стор.
...Mill ends his chapter with some searching questions concerning the justification of property in land: When the "sacredness of property" is talked of, it should always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It... | |
 | Anne Mackin - 2006 - 274 стор.
...George, echoed Jefferson and a strain of eighteenth-century French economic thought. As Mill argued, "When the 'sacredness of property' is talked of, it should always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 2006 - 477 стор.
...footing it ceases to be defensible, and the time has come for making some new arrangement of the matter. When the " sacredness of property " is talked of, it should always be remembered, that any such sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It... | |
 | D. Vaver - 2006 - 378 стор.
...less an observer than John Stuart Mill (1886), in his Principles of Political Economy, observed that: When the "sacredness of property" is talked of, it should always be remembered, that any sacredness does not belong in the same degree to landed property. No man made the land. It is the... | |
| |
