 | Diane Ravitch - 2000 - 656 стор.
...his speech last autumn at Columbus, Ohio, as reported in the New York Times, Senator Douglas said: "Our fathers, when they framed the Government under...question just as well, and even better, than we do now." I fully indorse this, and I adopt it as a text for this discourse. I so adopt it because it furnishes... | |
 | Alan G. Gross, Ray D. Dearin - 2003 - 166 стор.
...his speech last autumn, at Columbus, Ohio, as reported in "The New York T1mes," Senator Douglas said: "Our fathers , when they framed the Government under...question just as well, and even better than we do now." I fully indorse this, and I adopt it as a text for this discourse. I so adopt it because it furnishes... | |
 | John Channing Briggs - 2005 - 370 стор.
...allusive proofs in die middle of die speech: But enough! Let all who believe that "our fathers, who framed the Government under which we live, understood this question just as weil, and even better, than we do now," speak as they spoke, and act as they acted upon it. This is... | |
 | Ronald C. White - 2006 - 256 стор.
...perpetuation of political institutions that would be the focus of the address. LINCOLN'S GREATEST SPEECH 65 live, understood this question just as well, and even better, than we do now." The question under discussion was slavery. More precisely, "Does the proper division of local from... | |
 | Joseph Hartwell Barrett - 2006 - 842 стор.
...enforcing the sentiment expressed hy Mr. Douglas iu his Columbus speech of the previous autumn, namely : " Our fathers, when they framed the Government under which we live, understood thia question just as well, and even better, than we do now." The argument and its illustrations were... | |
 | Carl Sandburg - 2007 - 463 стор.
...They saw he had thought his way deeply among the issues and angers of the hour. He quoted Douglas: "Our fathers, when they framed the Government under which we live, understood this question [of slavery] just as well, and even better, than we do now." And who might these "fathers" be? Ineluded... | |
| |