| John G. Cameron - 2000 - 780 стор.
...coal tar waste from the construction site of a county convention center. The contract provided that "[n]o alterations shall be made in the work shown or described by the plans and specifications, except upon the written order of the Owner.'4' The court held that removal... | |
| 1893 - 362 стор.
...agreed that all drawings and specifications are and remain the property of the architects. ART. III. No alterations shall be made in the work shown or...architects, and when so made, the value of the work iidiieU or omitted shall be computed by the architects, and the amount so ascertained shall be added... | |
| 1898 - 1248 стор.
...agent to the -aid owner, shall and will provide all the materials, etc. No alterations shall be ruade In the work shown or described by the drawings and...made, the value of the work added or omitted shall !«• computed by the architects, and the amount so ascertained shall be added to, or deducted from,... | |
| American Railway Engineering Association - 1904 - 896 стор.
...remain the property of the Company and are to be returned on completion of building. ARTICLE III. — No alterations shall be made in the work shown or...specifications except upon a written order of the Engineer, and when so made, the value of the work added or omitted shall be computed by the Engineer,... | |
| Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1905 - 724 стор.
...be consistent with the original drawing and specifications referred to in Section I aforesaid. III. No alterations shall be made in the work shown or...specifications, except upon a written order of the architect, and when so made, the value of the work added or omitted shall be computed by the architect;... | |
| 1906 - 1266 стор.
...understanding and disposal of this case are as follows : "Article 3. No alteration shall be made la the work shown or described by the drawings and specifications except upon a written order of the architects. When so made the value of the work added or omitted shall be computed by the architects, and the amount... | |
| Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1900 - 784 стор.
...completed by September 15, 1893; that alterations should only be made upon written Laycock vs. Parker. order of the architects, and, when so made, the value of the work added or omitted should be computed by the architects, and the amounts so ascertained added to or deducted from the... | |
| |