 | Morris March Estee - 1886 - 728 стор.
...when there is reason to believe that an impartial trial can not be had therein ; when the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change ; and when from any cause the judge Is disqualified from acting.8 If the defendant desires a change... | |
 | 1886 - 988 стор.
...impartial jury could not be obtained to try the case in San Luis Obispo county; that the conveniences of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change; that great friendship existed between the judge of the court and the plaintiff, and deponent had reason... | |
 | 1886 - 948 стор.
...assumpsit, and the provision of the section respecting torts has no applicability. (2) The allegation that "the convenience of witnesses, and the ends of justice, would be subserved" by the change of venue, is not supported. The defendant in his affidavit names 11 witnesses... | |
 | Indiana - 1888 - 1024 стор.
...prejudice. Fourth. When the county is a party to the suit. Fifth. Showing to the satisfaction of the Court is section does not authorize conviction of an accessory after the acquittal prejudice, or interest of the Judge before whom the said cause is pending. (207.) 1. One or more co-parties... | |
 | 1915 - 1288 стор.
...to change the place of trial of this action from the county of Broome to the county of Ulster, upon the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted thereby, asking in the alternative that all proceedings on the part of the plaintiff in the Broome... | |
 | 1916 - 1216 стор.
...of a party to have the trial had in the proper county could not be defeated upon a motion by showing that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by changing the place of trial. If that doctrine is still in force, it controls this motion. There is... | |
 | 1908 - 1288 стор.
...witness, without suggesting that the place was Inconvenient for attendance, waived their right to move for a change of venue on the ground that the convenience of witnesses would be promoted, and it was an abuse of discretion to grant the change as a favor. Appeal from Special... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1918 - 912 стор.
...said witnesses to testify. In resisting this motion the defendant filed a counter affidavit, denying that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change of place of trial, deposing that the calendars of the several departments of the superior court of... | |
 | 1890 - 1130 стор.
...Green, PI. &Pr. §§ 625, 624, and the cases there cited. The judge may determine "when the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change, " and bis determination of those questions would be conclusive, ordinarily; but his discretion is a... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1890 - 618 стор.
..."1. When the county designated for that purpose is not the proper county. " 2. When the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change. "3. When the Judge shall have been, at any time, interested as party or counsel." The question of removal,... | |
| |
Court may change the place of trial in the following cases : 1. When the County designated for that purpose in the complaint is not the proper County ; 2. When there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had therein ; 3. When the convenience... 
