| Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1907 - 548 стор.
...its invalidity follows as a legal consequence." So in Bartlett v. Vinor, Garth. 251, Lord Holt said : "Every contract made for or about any matter or thing...statute is a void contract, though the statute itself doth not mention that it shall be so, but only inflicts a penalty on the offender, because a penalty... | |
| John William Smith - 1878 - 596 стор.
...r. Rowlands, 2 M. & W. 149. 1 " Every contract," said Lord Holt, in Bartlett r. Viner, Carth. 252, "made for or about any matter or thing which is prohibited...because a penalty implies a prohibition, though there are no prohibitory words in the statute ;" and although attempts have been at times made to consider... | |
| William Wait - 1878 - 1026 стор.
...statute (mala prohibita), no longer exists. See Hitt v. Spear, 50 K H. 253, 277 ; SC, 9 Am. Eep. 205. And every contract made for or about any matter or thing,...any statute, is a void contract, though the statute does not mention that it shall be so, but only inflicts a penalty on the offender ; because the penalty... | |
| Claude Charles Molyneux Plumptre - 1879 - 326 стор.
...certain penalty. In such cases the rule is as follows:— Penalty implies a Prohibition. RULE 73.—Every contract made for, or about, any matter or thing which is prohibited and made unlawful by statute is a void contract, though the statute does not mention that it shall be so, but only inflicts... | |
| Isaac Grant Thompson - 1879 - 888 стор.
...firkins not branded according to lawHere the court quote Lord HOLT as saying " that every contract made about, any matter or thing which is prohibited and made unlawful by any statute, is avoid contract, though the statute itself doth not mention that it shall be so, but only inflicts a... | |
| Hugh Barclay - 1880 - 922 стор.
...is prohibited and made unlawful by any statute, is a void contract, though the statute itself doth not mention that it shall be so, but only inflicts...because a penalty implies a prohibition, though there be no prohibiting words in the statute. — Bartlett, Carth. 252 ; Brown on Sale, p. 131. CONTRACT... | |
| 1886 - 1942 стор.
...matter or tiling which is prohibited and made unlawful by statute is a void contract, though the statute does not mention that it shall be so, but only inflicts a penalty on the offender; because the penalty implies a prohibition." Jiartlett v. Veii'rr, Garth. 252. In Smith v. Mnwhood, 14 Mees.... | |
| Ceylon. Supreme Court - 1880 - 254 стор.
...a penalty, because such a penalty implies a ' prohibition.' In Barilet v. Vinor, HOLT, CJ observed, 'Every ' contract made for or about any matter or thing which is prohi' bited and made unlawful by any statute, is a void contract, ' though the statute itself does... | |
| 1908 - 1082 стор.
...case of Bartletl v. Vinor, Lord Holt, CJ, said: "Every contract made for or about any matter or tiling which is prohibited and made unlawful by any statute...because a penalty implies a prohibition, though there are no prohi!)itory words in the statute." In Langton v. Huyhes, 1 M. & S. 596, Lord Ellenborough,... | |
| Edward Wilberforce - 1881 - 494 стор.
...is prohibited, or made declared68 unlawful by statute, is a void contract, though the vold- statute does not mention that it shall be so, but only inflicts...because a penalty implies a prohibition though there are no prohibitory words in the statute" (A). Therefore where the 10 Geo. II. c. 31, enacted that it... | |
| |