| Joseph Story - 2000 - 480 стор.
...against conscience or public convenience, has always refused its aid to stale demands where the party has slept upon his right, and acquiesced for a great length of time. Nothing can call forth this court into act1vity but conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence. Where these are wanting, the court is... | |
| Terence P. Ross - 2000 - 970 стор.
...and opinion withdrawn. May 22, 1991) (Aukerman 1) (quoting Smith v. Clay, XXIX Eng. Rep. 743 (1767) ("Nothing can call forth this court into activity,...conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence; where these are wanting. The Court is passive, and does nothing.")). Although Aukerman 1 was vacated... | |
| Peter Birks, Arianna Pretto-Sakmann, Arianna Pretto - 2002 - 465 стор.
...conscience, or public convenience, has always refused its aid to stale demands, where the party has slept upon his right, and acquiesced for a great length of time . . . " Expedit reipublicae ut sit finis litium," is a maxim that has prevailed in this court in all... | |
| Mohamed Ramjohn - 2004 - 722 стор.
...court of equity has always refused its aid to stale demands, where a party has slept upon his rights and acquiesced for a great length of time. Nothing...but conscience, good faith and reasonable diligence; where these are wanting, the court is passive and does nothing. It may be treated as inequitable to... | |
| |