| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1906 - 702 стор.
...National Banks, 23 Wall. 307, 320; United States v. Kirby, 7 Wall. 482, 486; Knowlton v. Moore, 178 US 77. All laws should receive a sensible construction. General...application as not to lead to injustice, oppression, or absurd consequence. It will always, therefore, be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions... | |
| 1893 - 1182 стор.
...proceeded, from the end in view, or the purpose which was designed. " U. S. v. Freeman, 3 How. 5C5. "All laws should receive a sensible construction....application as not to lead to injustice, oppression, or dn absurd consequence. It will always, therefore, be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions... | |
| 1900 - 1164 стор.
...to acts lawful In themselves, from the execution of which a temporary delay to the mail unavoidably follows. * * * All laws should receive a sensible...limited in their application as not to lead to injustice or oppression or an absurd consequence. It will always be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions... | |
| 1884 - 1006 стор.
...upon the words:" Id. 587; see Donalson v. "Wood, 22 Wend. 309; Lake Shore E'y Co. v. Roach, 80 NY 339. "All laws should receive a sensible construction....in their application as not to lead to injustice, oppresfioH, or an absurd consequence. It will always, therefore, be presumed tbat the legislature intended... | |
| Nevada. Supreme Court - 1885 - 532 стор.
...the court to look into, import words into the statute." Says the Court in US v. Kirby, 7 Wall. 482: "All laws should receive a sensible construction....language which would avoid results of this character. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over the letter. The common sense of man approves... | |
| United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - 1885 - 646 стор.
...intendit aliquid impossibile. In United States v. Kirby, (7 Wall., 486,) the Supreme Court say : " General terms should be so limited in their application...language which would avoid results of this* character. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over its letter." Considering, therefore, the specific... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 844 стор.
...physically impossible to perform. Besides, said this court in United States v. Kirby, 7 Wall. 482, 486, " General terms should be so limited in their application...language which would avoid results of this character. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over its letter." See also Carlisle v. United States,... | |
| John Davison Lawson - 1885 - 1126 стор.
...its language. All l*ws should receive a sensible construction. General terms should l 8 Law Hep. 77. be so limited in their application as not to lead...language which would avoid results of this character. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over its letter. The common sense of man approves... | |
| |