 | 1901 - 1214 стор.
...been passed. 'To what purpose,' it was said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137-176, 2 L. Kd. 60, 73, 'are powers limited, and to what purpose Is that limitation...distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if these limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed,... | |
 | 1912 - 1344 стор.
...purpose.' it was said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137, 167, 2 L. Ed. 60, 70, 'are limited powers, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to...distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers Is abolished, if those limits do not conflne the persons on whom they are imposed,... | |
 | 1914 - 812 стор.
...this is the case, it is the privilege and duty of the courts to intervene. For, as Marshall asked, "to what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose...time, be passed by those intended to be restrained?" 48 Subject the extension of the postal power to the test of reason, and the answer will be that the... | |
 | Henry William Blair - 1887 - 770 стор.
...limits have been passed. " To what purpose," it was said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137, 167, " are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at anytime, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited... | |
 | 1904 - 1256 стор.
...Ed. ЙО: "To what purpose are powers limited, and to what рш* pose is that limitation committed In writing, If these limits may at any time be passed by those intended to be restrained." "If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health Is a palpable... | |
 | 1888 - 942 стор.
...States is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited, and, that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the...distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1888 - 838 стор.
...limits have been passed. " To what purpose," it was said in Jfarbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137, 176, "are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation...distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed,... | |
 | 1888 - 572 стор.
...these limits have been passed. " To what purpose," it was said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cr. K57-167, " are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation...distinction between a government with limited and un-. limited power is abolished if these limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1906 - 678 стор.
...the judiciary to declare void any legislation violative of the Constitution. The chief justice asked: "To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose...is that limitation committed to writing, if these limitations may at any time be passed by those intended to be restrained?" The answer was obvious.... | |
 | 1903 - 658 стор.
...careful consideration. "The powers of the Legislature," he says, "are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the...distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed,... | |
| |
The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits... 
