...American case, Masierton v. Mayor, 7 Hill, 69. 8. SAME. The leading English case announces the rule thus: "Where two parties have made a contract which one...which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered, either arising naturallv,...

...leading English and American cases upon the subject of damages in actions ex contractn, apply. 1 " Where two parties have made a contract, which one...which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally—*'.*.,...

...leading English and American cases upon the subject of damages in actions ex contractu, apply. 1 " Where two parties have made a contract, which one...which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally—*'.*.,...

...conception of a legal injury." Wrong ami damage together sometimes not <t sufficient cause of action. of them has broken, the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract, should • be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising...

...by this and many other courts, the rule applicable to this case was thus stated by Baron ALDEBSON: "Where two parties have made a contract which one...which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly aud reasonably be considered either arising naturally,...

...to do or not to do some particular thing, as laid down in Hadley v. Baxandale, [9 Exch. 341], that "where two parties have made a contract which one...which the other party ought to receive in respect to such breach of contract should be either such as may fairly or substantially be considered as arising...

...of contract to do or not to do some particular thing, as laid down in Hadley v. Baxandale,1 that " where two parties have made a contract which one of...which the other party ought to receive in respect to such breach of contract should be either such as may fairly or substantially be considered as arising...

...Exch. 341, in which the court said : " "We think the proper rule in such a rase as the present is, where two parties have made a contract which one of...which the other party ought to receive, in respect to such breach of contract, should be either such as may be fairly and substantially considered as...

...of contract to do or not to do some particular thing, as laid down in Hadley v. Baxandale,1 that " where two parties have made a contract which one of...which the other party ought to receive in respect to such breach of contract should be either such as may fairly or substantially be considered 88O DAMAGES...

...quoted and universally accepted: "When two parties have made a contract which one of them has brokei), the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered, cither arising naturally,...