 | Sue Elworthy, Jane Holder - 1997 - 532 стор.
...'We think that the true rule of law is, that the person who for his own purposes brings on his lands and collects and keeps there anything likely to do...mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril, and, if he does not do so is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence... | |
 | N. C. Dhoundiyal - 1997 - 222 стор.
...The rule as laid down in the case of Rylands v. Fletcher11, speaks as "person who for his own purpose brings on his land and collects and keeps there anything likely to be a mischief of its escapes, must keep it at his peril, and if he does not do so is prima facie answerable... | |
 | Laura Westra - 1998 - 296 стор.
...refers to the judgment of Blackburn J.": We think that the true rule of the law is, that the person who, for his own purposes brings on his land and collects...do mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his own peril; and if he does not do so, is prima fade answerable for all the damage which is the natural... | |
 | Griselda Pollock - 1998 - 386 стор.
...no fault) liability and therefore warrants special attention. The rule was stated thus: The person who for his own purposes brings on his land and collects...anything likely to do mischief if it escapes must keep it at his peril and if he does not do so is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural... | |
 | Thomas Lundmark - 1998 - 264 стор.
...We think that the true rule of law is, that the person who for his own purposes brings on his lands and collects and keeps there anything likely to do...mischief if it escapes must keep it in at his peril, and, if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence... | |
 | Marie-Louise Larsson - 1999 - 696 стор.
...Environmental Damage Act, supra section 4.1.3.1.C. "We think that the true rule of law is that the person who, for his own purposes, brings on his land, and...mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril, and, if he does not do so, he is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence... | |
 | Academie de Droit International de la Haye - 1999 - 420 стор.
...harm-inflicting agent is relevant. The rule says : "that the person who for his own purposes brings onto his land and collects and keeps there anything likely...mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril, and, if he does not do so, he is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence... | |
 | Carl Meyer - 1998 - 260 стор.
...alkali works to produce the conclusion that ...the person who for his own purposes brings on his lands and collects and keeps there anything likely to do...mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril, and, if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence... | |
 | Thomas A. Street - 1999 - 540 стор.
...damage done by dangerous animate creatures was followed, and the doctrine was broadly laid down that one who for his own purposes brings on his land and collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief must keep it at his peril and is answerable for all damage which is the natural consequence of its... | |
 | Graham Stephenson - 2000 - 686 стор.
...had not ascertained where the shafts went to. We think that the true rule of law is, that the person who for his own purposes brings on his land and collects...mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril, and, if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence... | |
| |
We think that the true rule of law is that the person who, for his own purposes, brings on his land and collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril ; and if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable... 
