 | Robert Dransfield, Don Dransfield - 2003 - 244 стор.
...nothing optional or arbitrary in them . . . It is not so with the Distribution of wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. The things once...of whomsoever they please, and on whatever terms. Within production eternal and inexorable natural laws dominate; within distribution what dominates... | |
 | Claudia C. Klaver - 2003 - 264 стор.
...nature and human psychology. 8 "It is not so," Mill writes, "with the Distribution of wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. The things once...individually or collectively, can do with them as they like" (PPE 200). The laws of distribution, in other words, are structurally almost a complete inverse of... | |
 | Terry L. Anderson, Fred S. McChesney - 2003 - 412 стор.
...distribution of wealth via taxation, Mill asserted, was a matter of discretionary human institution. "The things once there, mankind, individually or collectively can do with them as they like" (Mill [1848] 1969, 200). The flaw in this statement is that the political distribution of "the things... | |
 | Nils Goldschmidt, Michael Wohlgemuth - 2004 - 304 стор.
...optional or arbitrary in them."28 Anders verhalte es sich mit der Verteilung des Wohlstands: „That is a matter of human Institution solely. The things once...individually or collectively, can do with them as they like. Dies ist der Stein des Anstoßes für FA von Hayek und viele andere Liberale. Da es sich hierbei um... | |
 | John L. Bowman - 2004 - 371 стор.
...to do with distribution. Humankind, according to Mill, ...[C] can do with [wealth] as they please. They can place them at the disposal of whomsoever they please, and on whatever terms... Even what a person has produced by his individual toil, unaided by anyone, he cannot keep, unless by... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 2006 - 477 стор.
...not so with the Distribution of Wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. The things oece there, mankind, individually or collectively, can...disposal whatever of them can only take place by the consent of society, or rather of those who dispose of its active force. Even what a person has produced... | |
 | Deepak Lal, James S Coleman Professor of International Development Studies Deepak Lal - 2006 - 346 стор.
...arbitrary in them. ... It is not so with the distribution of wealth. This is a matter of human institutions solely. The things once there, mankind, individually...disposal of whomsoever they please and on whatever terms."28 This is in contradiction to the truth known to all classical economists (including Marx)... | |
 | Margaret Schabas - 2009 - 208 стор.
...akin to the laws of physics and, thus, nonarbitrary. The distribution of wealth, by contrast, "is a matter of human institution solely. The things once...individually or collectively, can do with them as they like." Here is the region for genuine reform, particularly, Mill hopes, the reform of property rights. Yet,... | |
 | John R. Fitzpatrick - 2006 - 191 стор.
...makes the following statement as he passes from the theory of production to the theory of distribution: 'The things once there, mankind, individually or collectively, can do with them as they like.' Now, if that were true I would admit that it is a clear moral obligation to see that it is justly distributed.... | |
 | Henry George - 2006 - 453 стор.
...from the leading proposition — " The * Book II, Chapter I, Sec. i, Principles of Political Economy. things once there, mankind individually or collectively can do with them as they like." It is evidently this that in the mind of Mill himself and in the minds of the professors and students... | |
| |
It is not so with the Distribution of Wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. The things once there, mankind, individually or collectively, can do with them as they like. 
