 | Heinrich Dietzel - 1895 - 336 стор.
...amount of their previons accumulation etc." „It is not so with the distribution of wealth. That is matter of human institution solely. The things once there, mankind, individually or collectively, cau do with them as they like . . . The distribution of wealth therefore depends on the laws and customs... | |
 | Richard Theodore Ely - 1908 - 746 стор.
...arbitrary in them. ... It is not so with the distribution of wealth. That is a matter of human institutions solely. The things once there, mankind, individually or collectively, can do with them as they like. . . . The distribution of wealth, therefore, depends upon the laws and customs of society. The rules... | |
 | Richard Theodore Ely - 1910 - 730 стор.
...arbitrary in them. ... It is not so with the distribution of wealth. That is a matter of human institutions solely. The things once there, mankind, individually or collectively, can do with them as they like. . . . The distribution of wealth, therefore, depends upon the laws and customs of society. The rules... | |
 | Benjamin McAlester Anderson - 1911 - 246 стор.
...nothing optional or arbitrary in them. ... It is not so with the Distribution of Wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. The things once...disposal whatever of them can only take place by the consent of society, or rather of those who dispose of its active force. Even what a person has produced... | |
 | Benjamin McAlester Anderson - 1911 - 268 стор.
...nothing optional or arbitrary in them. ... It is not so with the Distribution of Wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. The things once...disposal whatever of them can only take place by the consent of society, or rather of those who dispose of its active force. Even what a person has produced... | |
 | Ramsden Balmforth - 1912 - 252 стор.
...nothing optional or arbitrary in them." But " it is not so with the distribution of wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. The things once...individually or collectively, can do with them as they like . . . Society can subject the distribution of wealth to whatever rules it thinks best." J Here is quite... | |
 | Jacob Harry Hollander - 1914 - 136 стор.
...wealth is a matter of human institution, solely. "The things once there," John Stuart Mill declared, "mankind, individually or collectively, can do with...of whomsoever they please, and on whatever terms. . . . Even what a person has produced by his individual toil, unaided by any one, he cannot keep unless... | |
 | JACOB H. HOLLANDER, Ph.D. - 1914 - 136 стор.
...wealth is a matter of human institution, solely. "The things once there," John Stuart Mill declared, "mankind, individually or collectively, can do with...of whomsoever they please, and on whatever terms. . . . Even what a person has produced by his individual toil, unaided by any one, he cannot keep unless... | |
 | Helen Gray - 1915 - 88 стор.
...point, that of the common weal." — Cossac. "The distribution of wealth is a matter of human interest solely. The things once there, mankind, individually...disposal whatever of them can only take place by the consent of society, or rather of those who dispose of its active force. Even what a person has produced... | |
 | Lucian Oldershaw - 1915 - 162 стор.
...cannot alter the ultimate properties either of matter or mind, but the distribution of Wealth is a matter of human institution solely. The things once there, mankind, individually or collectively, hcan do with them as they like. The laws of DistribuI tion therefore are the laws and customs of Society,... | |
| |
It is not so with the Distribution of Wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. The things once there, mankind, individually or collectively, can do with them as they like. 
