The Labor-value FallacyJeffery printing Company, 1887 - 112 стор. |
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
acquired Adam Smith agitation American workmen anarchists appeal to nature argument ask patronage believe capitalist causes Chapter charity Chicago Christian Union civilization classes common competition created by labor demands destruction discontent doctrine dynamite employers equal erty exertion existing fact faculty favor free love George's Henry George human ideas idle individual ownership industry International Workingmen's Association Josiah Strong Knights of Labor labor creates labor organizations labor-exchanges Labor-Value Fallacy large number League live means modern multiply owners ownership of land political economy poor popular population possession principles private property Progress and Poverty prop property in land property is theft question railroad reason revolution rich right of property robbery savages says seems Socialistic Labor Party society sympathies teachings theory things thought tion to-day United value in exchange value is created value-perceiving Vanderbilt wage-workers wages wants wealth is created winter of discontent workingmen
Популярні уривки
Сторінка 62 - For I say unto you, that unto every one which hath shall be given ; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.
Сторінка 8 - In that early and rude state of society, which precedes both the accumulation of stock and the appropriation of land, the proportion between the quantities of labour necessary for acquiring different objects seems to be the only circumstance which can afford any rule for exchanging them for one another. If, among a nation of hunters, for example, it usually costs twice...
Сторінка 56 - Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.
Сторінка 108 - ... is monopolized. To extirpate poverty, to make wages what justice commands they should be, the full earnings of the laborer, we must therefore substitute for the individual ownership of land a common ownership. Nothing else will go to the cause of the evil — in nothing else is there the slightest hope. This, then, is the remedy for the unjust and unequal distribution of wealth apparent in modern civilization, and for all the evils which flow from it: We must make land common property.
Сторінка 112 - Having lost all faith in the ballot, the Internationals propose to carry out their "reforms" by force. The following is from the Pittsburgh manifesto : " Agitation for the purpose of organization ; organization for the purpose of rebellion. In these few words the ways are marked, which the workers must take if they want to be rid of their chains. We could show, by scores of illustrations, that all attempts in the past to reform this monstrous system by peaceable means, such as the ballot, have been...
Сторінка 112 - When the laboring men understand that the heaven which they are promised hereafter is but a mirage, they will knock at the door of the wealthy robber, with a musket in hand, and demand their share of the goods of this life now.
Сторінка 8 - The real price of everything, what everything really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it. What everything is really worth to the man who has acquired it, and who wants to dispose of it or exchange it for something else, is the toil and trouble which it can save to himself, and which it can impose upon other people.
Сторінка 109 - The truth is, and from this truth there can be no escape, that there is and can be no just title to an exclusive possession of the soil, and that private property in land is a bold, bare, enormous wrong, like that of chattel slavery.
Сторінка 109 - It is not merely a robbery in the past; it is a robbery in the present — a robbery that deprives of their birthright the infants that are now coming into the world! Why should we hesitate about making short work of such a system? Because I was robbed yesterday, and the day before, and the day before that, is it any reason that I should suffer myself to be robbed to-day and to-morrow? any reason that I should conclude that the robber has acquired a vested right to rob me?
Сторінка 38 - The institution of property, when limited to its essential elements, consists in the recognition, in each person, of a right to the exclusive disposal of what he or she have produced by their own exertions, or received either by gift or by fair agreement, without force or fraud, from those who produced it. The foundation of the whole is, the right of producers to what they themselves have produced.