American Law Reports Annotated, Том 55Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1928 |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-5 із 100
Сторінка 3
... paid - in or invested capital on January 6 , 1926 , was , apparently , at least $ 4,000,000 . On the date last mentioned , not- withstanding there was a capital deficit admitted by the defendant , the board of directors of the defend ...
... paid - in or invested capital on January 6 , 1926 , was , apparently , at least $ 4,000,000 . On the date last mentioned , not- withstanding there was a capital deficit admitted by the defendant , the board of directors of the defend ...
Сторінка 4
... paid - in or invested capital . " The complainants claim they are entitled to the injunctive relief prayed for because of contract rights growing out of the relation between the preferred stockholder and the corporation . They say ...
... paid - in or invested capital . " The complainants claim they are entitled to the injunctive relief prayed for because of contract rights growing out of the relation between the preferred stockholder and the corporation . They say ...
Сторінка 5
... paid - in capital , unless the doctrine known as the " wasting asset doctrine " is the law of the state , and applicable to this case . We understand the argument of the defendant on this point to be that the pertinent statute law of ...
... paid - in capital , unless the doctrine known as the " wasting asset doctrine " is the law of the state , and applicable to this case . We understand the argument of the defendant on this point to be that the pertinent statute law of ...
Сторінка 8
... paid : b . Distinction in England between fixed and floating capital , 20 . III . Determination of net profits or surplus available for dividends ; factors b . Debts or interest owing by corporation ; sinking. In the Mellon Case , while ...
... paid : b . Distinction in England between fixed and floating capital , 20 . III . Determination of net profits or surplus available for dividends ; factors b . Debts or interest owing by corporation ; sinking. In the Mellon Case , while ...
Сторінка 15
... paid out of capital , the result in some instances depend- ing on the court's views regarding the trust - fund theory of corporate assets . Attention is called particularly to the statement in McDonald v . Williams ( U.S. ) cited in ...
... paid out of capital , the result in some instances depend- ing on the court's views regarding the trust - fund theory of corporate assets . Attention is called particularly to the statement in McDonald v . Williams ( U.S. ) cited in ...
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
affirmed alighting alimony alleged amendment amount annotation appeared application assessment assets Asso authority award bank beneficiary building capital stock cause of action claim clause Constitution contract corporation court held court of equity creditors damages death debts declaring dividends defendant dends directors divi dividends duty effect entitled fact fraud fund insolvent Iowa issue judgment jury land liability ment mortgage N. J. Eq N. R. Co N. Y. Supp Nick Brothers opinion ordinance owner paid pany parties passenger payment person plaintiff plea plea in abatement poration profits purpose question R. C. L. Supp reason receiver recover rent risk insurance rule Stat statute stockholders street car supra surplus Teleg thereof tiel tion trial trust United war risk insurance
Популярні уривки
Сторінка 218 - it condemns, which proceeds not arbitrarily or capriciously, but upon inquiry, and renders judgment only after trial, so that every citizen shall hold his life, liberty, property, and immunities under the protection of the general rules which govern society. Hurtado v. California, 110 US 516, 28 L. ed. 232, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. Ill, 292;
Сторінка 522 - Taxes may be levied and collected for public purposes only. They shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax, and all taxes shall be levied and collected by general laws.
Сторінка 216 - The constitutional guaranty of due process of law requires that every man shall have his day in court and the benefit of the general law, a law which hears before it condemns, which proceeds not arbitrarily or capriciously, but upon inquiry, and renders judgment only after trial.
Сторінка 587 - the common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States, or the Constitution or laws of this state, is the rule of decision in all of the courts of this state.
Сторінка 649 - providing that in the event of a disagreement as to a claim under a contract of insurance between the Bureau and any beneficiaries thereunder, an action on the claim may be brought against the United States in the district court of the United States in and for the district in which such beneficiaries, or any one of them,
Сторінка 649 - in the event of disagreement as to a claim under the contract of insurance between the Bureau and any beneficiary or beneficiaries thereunder, an action on the claim may be brought against the United States in the district court of the United States in and for the district in which such beneficiaries, or any one of them resides,
Сторінка 685 - unless and until, and then only to the extent that, upon application by the carrier, and after investigation by the commission of the purposes and uses of the proposed issue and the proceeds thereof, . . . the commission by order authorizes such issue or assumption.
Сторінка 649 - the United States, in respect to which the party would be entitled to redress against the United States, either in a court of law or equity, if the United States were suable,
Сторінка 610 - brother" and "sister" include the children of a person who, for a period of not less than one year, stood in loco parentis to a member of the military or naval forces at any time prior to his enlistment or induction,
Сторінка 3 - to all statutes, that what is fairly implied is as much granted as what is expressed, it remains that the charter of a corporation is the measure of its powers, and that the enumeration "of these powers implies the exclusion of all others." Thomas v. West Jersey R. Co. 101 US 71, 25 L. ed. 950.