Zurcher V. Stanford Daily: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 3486 and H.R. 4181 ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 - 350 стор. |
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
14th amendment amici curiae ANPA apply arrest attorney attorney's authority Bailey bill Branzburg California cause to believe Chairman client commerce commerce clause confidential CONGRESS THE LIBRARY congressional constitutional crime criminal defense District documentary materials documents enacted evidence exclusionary rule fact Federal files Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment GUDGER HANSEN HEYMANN innocent third parties interests investigation involved issuance issue journalists KASTENMEIER LANDAU law enforcement officials lawyers legislation limited magistrate ment Minn Minnesota newspaper newsroom obtain Pentagon Papers person possession Press Association privilege probable cause problem procedures proposal prosecution prosecutors question RAILSBACK reason to believe records Reporters Committee restricted rule rummaging search and seizure search warrant seized SHATTUCK Stanford Daily Stanford Daily decision statement statute subcommittee subpoena duces tecum Supreme Court suspected testimony Thank third-party searches tion TUSHNET U.S. Supreme Court United violation warrant to search Zurcher
Популярні уривки
Сторінка 335 - It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all others vested in congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the constitution.
Сторінка 327 - If from the evidence it appears to the commissioner that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed...
Сторінка 335 - The wisdom and the discretion of congress, their identity with the people, and the influence which their constituents possess at elections are in this, as in many other instances, — as that, for example, of declaring war, — the sole restraints on which they have relied to secure them from its abuse. They are the restraints on which the people must often rely solely in all representative governments.
Сторінка 88 - Restricted Data' means all data concerning (1) design, manufacture, or utilization of atomic weapons; (2) the production of special nuclear material; or (3) the use of special nuclear material in the production of energy, but shall not include data declassified or removed from the Restricted Data category pursuant to section 142.
Сторінка 318 - Possessed, controlled, or designed or intended for use or which is or has been used in violation of Title 18, USC,S 957.
Сторінка 261 - A lawyer should be fully informed of all the facts of the matter he is handling in order for his client to obtain the full advantage of our legal system. It is for the lawyer in the exercise of his independent professional judgment to separate the relevant and important from the irrelevant and unimportant. The observance of the ethical obligation of a lawyer to hold inviolate the confidences and secrets of his client not only facilitates the full development of facts essential to proper representation...
Сторінка 152 - They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone — the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
Сторінка 338 - Correctly viewed, § 5 is a positive grant of legislative power authorizing Congress to exercise its discretion in determining- whether and what legislation is needed to secure the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Сторінка 152 - To protect that right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the Government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Сторінка 339 - Congress power to exercise discretion in the other direction and to enact ‘statutes so as in effect to dilute equal protection and due process decisions of this Court.