Зображення сторінки
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

I COULD relate many instances of injustice arising from precipitancy in awarding punishment, and of the beneficial effects of systematically deferring to pronounce sentence till the heat of the moment had passed; but the following anecdotes, for the accuracy of which I can vouch, seem sufficient to arrest the attention to good purpose.

Two men-of-war happened to be cruising in company; one of them, a line-of-battle ship, bearing an admiral's flag; the other, a small frigate. One day, when they were sailing quite close to each other, the signal was made from the large to the small ship to chase in a particular direction, implying that a strange sail was seen in that quarter.

The look-out man at the maintop-mast-head of the frigate was instantly called down by the captain, and severely punished on the spot, for not having discovered and reported the stranger before the flag-ship had made the signal to chase.

The unhappy sufferer, who was a very young hand, unaccustomed to be aloft, had merely taken his turn at the mast-head with the rest of the ship's company, and could give no explanation of his apparent neglect.

Before it was too late, however, the officer of the watch ventured to suggest to the captain, that possibly the difference of height between the masts of the two ships might have enabled the look-out man on board the admiral to discover the stranger, when it was physically impossible, owing to the curvature of the earth, that she could have been seen on board the frigate. No attention, however, was paid to this remark, and a punishment, due only to crime, or to a manifest breach of discipline, was inflicted.

The very next day, the same officer, whose remonstrance had proved so ineffectual, saw the look-out man at the flag-ship's mast-head again pointing out a strange sail. The frigate chanced to be placed nearly in the direction indicated; consequently she must have been somewhat nearer to the stranger than the lineof-battle ship was. But the man stationed at the frigate's masthead declared he could distinguish nothing of any stranger. Upon which the officer of the watch sent up the captain of the main-top, an experienced and quick-sighted seaman, who having for some minutes looked in vain in every direction, asserted positively that there was nothing in sight from that elevation. It was thus rendered certain, or at all events highly probable, that

the precipitate sentence of the day before had been unjust; for, under circumstances precisely similar (or even less favourable) it appeared that the poor fellow could not by possibility have seen the stranger, for not first detecting which he was punished.

I must give the conclusion of this painful story in the words of my informant, the officer of the deck, one of the kindest, and bravest, and best of men :

"I reported all this to the captain of the ship, and watched the effect. He seemed on the point of acknowledging that his heart smote him; but pride prevailed, and it was barely an ejaculation that escaped. So much for angry feelings getting the better of judgment !"

I have seldom related this anecdote in any company without observing that it drew forth from those who listened to it a marked and unqualified expression of censure. And the case,

I admit, is a very strong one. But before we condemn, without mercy, the object of our indignation, I would venture to ask, which man amongst us all, whether at sea, in the command of a ship, or on shore, at the head of a regiment, or in the sober management of a mercantile house, or even in the tranquil jogtrot of a family, in the most private station of life, can honestly and fearlessly say that he has never, in moments of haste, been guilty of acts, if not quite so severe, at least as unjust? I have already admitted that I myself am not of this fortunate number, and I may, therefore, be permitted to urge upon others the necessity of interposing as many artificial checks as possible upon the excitements of passion.-CAPTAIN HALL.

[blocks in formation]

IN the earlier stages of society, every member of the community may be said to supply all his wants by his own personal labour. He acquires his food by the chase-he sows and reaps his own grain-he gathers his own fruit-he cuts the skin which forms his dress so as to fit his own person-he makes the sandals or buskins which protect his feet. He is, therefore, better or worse accommodated, exactly in proportion to the personal skill and industry which he can apply to that purpose.1 But it is discovered, in process of time, that one man has particular dexterity in hunting, being, we shall suppose, young, active, and enterprising; another, older and of a

more staid character, has peculiar skill in tilling the ground, or in managing cattle and flocks; a third, lame, perhaps, or infirm, has a happy talent for cutting out and stitching together garments, or for shaping and sewing shoes. It becomes, therefore, for the advantage of all, that the first man shall attend to nothing but hunting, the second confine himself to the cultivation of the land, and the third remain at home to make clothes and shoes. But then it follows, as a necessary consequence, that the huntsman must give to the man who cultivates the land a part of his venison and skins, if he desires to have grain of which to make bread, or a cow to furnish his family with milk; and that both the hunter and the agriculturist must give a share of the produce of the chase, and a proportion of the grain, to the third man, to obtain from him clothes and shoes. Each is thus accommodated with what he wants a great deal better, and more easily, by every one following a separate occupation, than they could possibly have been had each of the three been hunter, farmer, and tailor, in his own person, practising two of the trades awkwardly and unwillingly, instead of confining himself to that which he perfectly understands and pursues with success. This mode of accommodation is called barter, and is the earliest kind of traffic by which men exchange their property with each other, and satisfy their wants by_parting with their superfluities.

But, in process of time, barter is found inconvenient. The husbandman, perhaps, has no use for shoes when the shoemaker is in need of corn, or the shoemaker may not want furs or venison when the hunter desires to have shoes. To remedy this, almost all nations have introduced the use of what is called money; that is to say, they have fixed on some particular substance capable of being divided into small portions, which, having itself little intrinsic value applicable to human use, is nevertheless received as a representative of the value of all commodities. Particular kinds of shells are used as money in some countries; in others, leather, cloth, or iron, are employed; but gold and silver, divided into small portions, are used for this important purpose almost all over the world.

That you may understand the use of this circulating representative of the value of commodities, and comprehend the convenience which it affords, let us suppose that the hunter, as we formerly said, wanted a pair of shoes, and the shoemaker had no occasion for venison, but wanted some corn; while the husbandman, not desiring to have shoes, stood in need of some other commodity. Here are three men, each desirous of some article of necessity or convenience which he cannot obtain by barter, because the party whom he has to deal with does not want the

commodity which he has to offer in exchange. But supposing the use of money introduced, and its value acknowledged, these three persons are accommodated by means of it in the amplest manner possible. The shoemaker does not want the venison which the hunter offers for sale, but some other man in the village is willing to purchase it for five pieces of silver; the hunter sells his commodity and goes to the shoemaker, who, though he would not barter the shoes for the venison which he did not want, readily sells them for the money, and going with it to the farmer, buys from him the quantity of corn he needs; while the farmer, in his turn, purchases whatever he is in want of, or, if he requires nothing at the time, lays the pieces of money aside, to use when he has occasion.-SCOTT's Tales of a Grandfather.'

1. To what purpose? and how might | with their right hand (Lat. dexter) than the idea be better brought out? their left, and hence dexterity means

2. Most people can do things better cleverness.

[blocks in formation]

THE following passage from the 'Records of Creation,' by Dr. Sumner, is so much to the purpose, and carries so much greater weight with it than anything which I could say, both as to the benefits arising from educating the poor, and making them as far as possible the instruments through which it is to be done, that I cannot but quote it :-" Of all obstacles to improvement ignorance is the most formidable, because the only true secret of assisting the poor is by making them agents in bettering their own condition, and to supply them, not with a temporary stimulus but with a permanent energy. As fast as the standard of intelligence is raised, the poor become more and more able to co-operate in any plan proposed for their advantage, and more likely to listen to any reasonable suggestion, and more able to understand, and therefore more willing to pursue it. Hence it follows, that when gross ignorance is once removed and right principles are introduced, a great advantage has been already gained against squalid poverty. Many avenues to an improved condition are opened to one whose faculties are enlarged and exercised; he sees his own interest more clearly; he pursues it more steadily, and he does not study immediate gratification at the expense of bitter and late repentance, or mortgage the labour of his future

life without an adequate return. Indigence, therefore, will rarely be found in company with good education."

My own experience strongly confirms the truth of these sentiments, and I invariably find that those parents (of whom there are many) who do not avail themselves of the school, are not those who have the lowest wages, or earn the least money, but they are the most ignorant, and their habits of life are of so low and degraded a nature, that they are not only indifferent to the welfare and moral conduct of their own children, but are perfectly regardless of the good opinion of those around them: many of them, such as are living in crowded cottages, and from the force of habit and bad management can make no effort to keep their children decently clean; and, in fact, their standard of moral feeling is so low, whether arising out of their physical condition I do not know, as to make them appear to have little beyond the animal instinct of feeding their young, so as to keep the body alive, and have not the slightest notion of anything which is not of a gross and sensual nature. I would have it inculcated by every father in his family, by every schoolmaster in his school, by every clergyman in his parish, that the man who needlessly throws himself for support on the industry of others, lowers himself in the scale of human beings, and in some respect partakes of the character of a dishonest man; that he does not act up to the precepts of Christianity which he professes; and that the strong feeling of the labouring class, which prevails more particularly in the south of England, of "why spare the parish ?" and which is encouraged by the strangely mistaken principles on which the farmers act, not only has a tendency in every possible way to lower their condition by interfering with the price of labour, and thus lowering their standard of social comforts, by totally destroying every feeling of self-respect and of manly independence; but also that in past times it has almost destroyed the whole social system to which they belong, and may do so again if not guarded against by a system of education of the lower classes, which shall teach them more of forethought in what concerns their own domestic affairs, and give them a greater insight as to how all this bears upon the well-being, not only of their own class, but of the country to which they belong.

In saying this of the labouring class I do not throw the blame upon them as regards the past-far from it; I think much greater blame attaches itself to the classes above them, who, without having the excuse of want of education, have not paid that attention to their condition, physical and moral, which it was their duty to do. Nor would I less press upon the attention of the rising generation, those of them likely to be the future

« НазадПродовжити »