J., observed that in order for it to apply "there must be reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not... The Southwestern Reporter - Сторінка 291905Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
| 1869 - 1032 стор.
...in the ordinary course of things, does not happen to those who have the management of machinery and use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care." But that case also differs from die present... | |
| Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee, Edmund F. Moore - 1864 - 596 стор.
...Defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the Defendants, that the accident arose from want of care," which rule, we submit, is applicable to the... | |
| 1881 - 572 стор.
...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such us in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care, " — was applied to a bale of goods slung from... | |
| 1881 - 572 стор.
...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such из iu the ordinary course of things does not bap)>eii if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, iu the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care, " — was... | |
| 1871 - 874 стор.
...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." So in Ourtis v. The Rochester and Syracuse Railroad Company,... | |
| Victoria. Supreme Court - 1871 - 380 стор.
...under the management of the defendant, the accident is such aa in the ordinary course does not happen if ^those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care. Seoll v. London Dock Company,... | |
| New York (State). Court of Appeals, Hiram Edward Sickels - 1872 - 788 стор.
...management of the defendant, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence that the accident arose from want of care. (Scott v. Lond. Dock Co., 3 Hurlst. & Colt., 596.) It is... | |
| 1917 - 510 стор.
...management of the defendant, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care."8 If a passenger in the train of a common carrier is injured... | |
| 1898 - 562 стор.
...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care.' In those words it is approved in 1895 in Shafer... | |
| Francis Wharton - 1874 - 960 стор.
...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendBOOK I.] PROVINCES OF COURT AND JURY. [§ 423. § 423. Contributory negligence, — burden on... | |
| |