A Study of ArcheologySouthern Illinois University Press, 1967 - 262 стор. Prompted by the need for a conceptual scheme of archeological research, A Study of Archeology deals with the development of the science from many diverse interests and the consequent confusion in its theoretical structure, aims, and relationships with other disciplines. The author has wisely avoided trying to create a rigidly contrived (and therefore unworkable) system for gathering, analyzing, and synthesizing archeological materials. Instead, he has concentrated on both destructive and constructive criticism, synthesizing from the two of them a single theory of archeology. Mr. Taylor labels his theory the "conjunctive approach," and he explains it carefully and illustratively as basic to valid cultural study. Professional archeologists and scholars in related fields will find that the book compels self-analysis, and its clarity of style and purpose makes it readily assimilative for general readers.--Cover |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-3 із 39
Сторінка 47
... reason and because there is a rather widely held idea that Basket - Maker II " is certainly well understood " ( McGregor , 1941 , p . 207 ) , this and his other Marsh Pass report ( Guernsey and Kidder , 1921 ) must be considered here ...
... reason and because there is a rather widely held idea that Basket - Maker II " is certainly well understood " ( McGregor , 1941 , p . 207 ) , this and his other Marsh Pass report ( Guernsey and Kidder , 1921 ) must be considered here ...
Сторінка 99
... reason that certain civilizations have flourished more than some others ( they say ) is because they have received more , or more elaborate , " culture streams . " The deductions from this premise are the same as from the first ...
... reason that certain civilizations have flourished more than some others ( they say ) is because they have received more , or more elaborate , " culture streams . " The deductions from this premise are the same as from the first ...
Сторінка 149
... reason that these relationships are multiple and an assessment of their relative importance is in the majority of cases a question of judgment , not of mathematics . To me there seems no barrier to classifying a given cultural ...
... reason that these relationships are multiple and an assessment of their relative importance is in the majority of cases a question of judgment , not of mathematics . To me there seems no barrier to classifying a given cultural ...
Зміст
PART I | 3 |
History or Anthropology? | 23 |
PART II | 93 |
Авторські права | |
3 інших розділів не відображаються
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
abstraction American Antiquity Americanist archeology analysis Anasazi Ancient Aspect antiquarianism appear archeological data archeological materials archeological research archeologist artifacts association behavior biological bone burial Carnegie Institution cave ceramic Chaco Canyon Chichen Itza chronological classification Coahuila coiled basketry complex conjunctive approach construction cultural anthropology cultural categories cultural context cultural picture cultural relationships culture traits descriptive detailed discipline empirical epigraphy ethnography Ethnology evidence example excavation fact factors field Fort Ancient Culture Griffin historians historiography human hypotheses Ibid idea important indicate individual inferences interest interpretation investigation Kaminaljuyu Kidder McKern means method mounds Museum nature objects past actuality patterns pertinent peyotism phenomena pottery Prehistoric presence-and-absence present study problems procedure provenience pueblo purpose reconstruction Room 24b says Science seems sherds significance Sinagua Snaketown social Society sociology specific specimens stratigraphic synthesis taxonomic technique textile tion trait lists typology Uaxactun United Webb
Посилання на книгу
Hawaiki, Ancestral Polynesia: An Essay in Historical Anthropology Patrick Vinton Kirch,Roger C. Green Обмежений попередній перегляд - 2001 |
The Archaeology of Death Robert Chapman,Ian Kinnes,Klavs Randsborg Обмежений попередній перегляд - 1981 |