 ... shall not be held to have assumed the risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any .statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee.  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Сторінка 444автори: Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, James M. Reasoner, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Richard W. Cooper - 1913Повний перегляд - Докладніше про цю книгу
 | Kentucky - 1918 - 808 стор.
...any of the provisions of this act to recover damages for injuries to, or the death of, any employe, such employe shall not be held to have assumed the...the violation by such common carrier of any statute, State or Federal, enacted for the safety of employes contributed to the injury or death of such employe.... | |
 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 стор.
...the provisions of this act to recover damages for injuries to, or the death of, any of its employes, such employe shall not be held to have assumed the...contributed to the injury or death of such employe. ' ' Section 5. That any contract, rule, regulation or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 стор.
...statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury of such employee, and such employee shall not be held to have assumed the risk of his...common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee." It is contended that, unless taken... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 806 стор.
...employee who may be injured or killed shall be held to have been guilty of contributory negligence in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee.' And by section 4: 'Such employee shall... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 стор.
...guilty of contributory negligence many case where the violation by such common carrier railroad company of any statute enacted for the safety of employes contributed to the injury of such employe, and such employe shall not be held to have assumed the risk of his employment in any... | |
 | 1916 - 506 стор.
...Act assumption of risk is only eliminated as a defense where the railroad company's violation of some statute enacted for the safety of employes contributed to the injury or death of the employe. — Huxoll v. Union Pac. R. Co., Neb., 156 NW 900. 73. Workmen's Compensation Act. —... | |
 | 1918 - 1210 стор.
...Congress above referred to provides that the employe— "shall not be held to have assumed the risks of his employment in any case where the violation...common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employés contributed to the injury or death of such employé." The Inference to be drawn from the... | |
 | 1915 - 1128 стор.
...assumption of risk remains as at common law, saving in the cases mentioned in section 4; that is to say, any case where the violation by such common carrier...contributed to the injury or death of such employe." Our own cases have uniformly held that assumption of the risk no longer constitutes a defense, where... | |
| |
