The most obnoxious article (the 12th) being suspended by the Senate, there is no occasion to express any sentiment thereon.-I wish, however, it had appeared in a different form.-And altho' it is but fair to presume that, no further advantage could have been obtained in the 3d article, yet the exclusion of the vessels belonging to the United States from all the "Seaports, Harbours, Bays, or Creeks of His Majesty," when theirs are admitted into all ours, to the highest Ports of entry, is not marked with reciprocity. It may be urged and truly, that under the existing regulations of the B. government, we are not, at this time, allowed those privileges; except when they are made to subserve their own purposes: whilst from Quebec (but how we are to get there I know not,) and upwards, the lakes, and the waters on their side of the line, are open to our commerce, and that we have equal advantages in the Indian trade on both sides; except within the limits of the Hudson's bay company. All this looks very well on paper; but I much question whether in its operation it will not be found to work very much against us. Ist. What are the limits of that company?—are they so defined, and so clearly understood, as that our traders when they are in the Wilderness can with precision say, thus far I may of right go, without let or hindrance? 2nd. Admitting the fact, will they not, having possession of the trade, and the Indians being in their interest, by every artifice of their traders, prevent ours from extending themselves into the country— sharing in the profit, and thereby bringing on disputes which may terminate seriously.— 3d. Does not the hitherto (I might add present) improper interference of the British, within our territory, and the sollicitude that that government has manifested upon all occasions to get a footing on the Mississippi; and on the waters and carrying places leading thereto, evince, in a most unequivocal manner, that disputes may be expected to arise within our territory as well as their own, from the attempts of their Traders to monopolize the trade; and from the overbearing support, or underhand countenance, they will give, not only in what is right, but in what is convenient, to its views also.— My opinion of this article therefore is, that it would have been more for our peace, if not for our interest, to have restrained the traders of both nations to their own side of the line, leaving the Indians on each, to go to whichsoever their interest, convenience, or inclination, might prompt them. This would have thwarted the views of the British on the Mississippi, whilst all the doors into upper Canada, and the Western Country would have been as wide open then, as they are now made by the treaty; and no difficulty I am persuaded would have been found by our people, of introducing goods across the line, after they had got them to it, and the Posts possessed by us, if this avenue should be found the most convenient and cheapest. I wish too the 2nd article had been more defi nite with respect to the terms "Precincts or Jurisdiction."-Except that the shortness of its duration for operation may afford a remedy, I should expect many disputes would arise therefrom. I asked, or intended to ask in my letter of the 3d whether you conceived (admitting the suspension of the 12th Article should be agreed to by the B. government) there would be a necessity for the treaty going before the Senate again for their advice and consent? This question takes its birth from a declaration of the minority of that body, to that effect. With much truth and sincerity I am always your affectionate &c P. S. I was almost in the act of sending the enclosed letter to the Post Office when your favor of the 11th was put into my hands. Query-Whether the passage, which you have quoted from the 15th article in your letter of the above date does not mean that no prohibition shall be imposed on the exportation or importation of any articles to or from the U. S. which shall not be also imposed on the like exportation or importation to or from other foreign nations? That is that the U. S. shall be under no other disability, than any other foreign nations.—If so, there would seem to be no privilege granted, but only an engagement, that other nations shall not be rivals to the U. S. by being freed from the prohibition. For example-Your idea is, that whatever of its own produce Spain may carry from their territory; that is, they may re-export to England Spanish produce.-I wish this could be made clear; for I readily see the advantage of it in one sense; tho' I am not sure that we can bring any Country, except the East Indies, into our own, the produce of it, and reexport it to England so as to make a profit from this circuitous voyage. TO ALEXANDER HAMILTON. MY DEAR SIR, PHILADELPHIA, 14 July, 1795. I received your favor of yesterday, this moment, when I am on the eve of a journey to Virginia.' The opinion which you have given as to its being necessary to submit the new article to the Senate, being in direct opposition to that of the Secretaries and the Attorney-general, has occasioned some embarrassment with me.-For I always understood it to be the sense of the majority of the Senate, that they were not to pass their judgment upon the new article further than they have done.-But as I shall be absent, and Mr. Randolph has before him the bringing of this business to a close; I wish you to write to him your ideas, if upon mature reflection you shall think differently from the gentlemen around me; or you find the sense of the Senate to be different from what I have been led to expect. I have told Mr. Randolph that your sentiments do not agree with those which I received from the Officers of government; and have desired him to revise them. 'He set out for Mt. Vernon on the next day. I have also told him that I have requested the favor of you to write to him on this subject. Very affectionately &c. P. S. Notwithstanding one great object of my visit to Mount Vernon, is relaxation; yet, to hear from you, the sentimts. entertained of the treatyand in short on any other interesting subject, with which the public mind is occupied would be a considerable gratification.-The state of our pecuniary matters in Holland, at this time, is a bar to Mr. Adams's leaving that country-but the next best step will be adopted.— Yours as before. TO EDMUND RANDOLPH, SECRETARY OF STATE. DEAR SIR, Both your letters, dated the 17th instant, found me at this place, where I arrived on Monday. The letter from the commissioners to you, I return, as I also do the gazettes of Pittsburg and Boston. The proceedings at the latter place are of a very unpleasant nature. The result I forwarded to you from Baltimore, accompanied with a few hasty lines, written at the moment I was departing from thence; with a request that it might be considered by the confidential officers of government, and returned to me with an answer thereto, if an answer should be deemed advisable.1 1 He had written : "The application is of an unusual and disagreeable nature, and moreover is intended, I have no doubt, to place me in an embarrassed situation, from whence an advantage may be taken." |