CHAPTER XI. STRENGTH OF POSTS, STRUTS, AND COLUMNS. As the strength of a post, strut, or column, depends primarily upon the resistance of the given material to crushing, we must first determine the ultimate crushing-strength of all materials used for this purpose. The following table gives the strength for all materials used in building, excepting brick, stone, and masonry, which will be found in Chap. VI. TABLE I. Average Ultimate Crushing-Loads, in Pounds per Square Inch, for Building-Materials. The values given for wrought and cast iron are those generally used, although a great deal of iron is stronger than this. The values for white oak, yellow pine, and spruce, are derived from experiments on full-size posts, made with the government testingmachine at Watertown, Mass.; the smaller value representing the strength of such timber as is usually found in the market, and the larger value, the strength of thoroughly seasoned straightgrained timber. For these woods a smaller factor of safety may be used than for the others, the strength of which was derived from experiments on small pieces. The values for wood are for dry timber. Wet timber is only about one-half as strong to resist compression as dry timber, and this fact should be taken into account when using green timber. The strength of a column, post, or strut depends, in a large measure, upon the proportion of the length to the diameter or least thickness. Up to a certain length, they break simply by compression, and above that they break by first bending sideways, and then breaking. Wooden Columns. For wooden columns, where the length is not more than twelve times the least thickness, the strength of the column or strut may be computed by the rule, Safe load = area of cross-section X C (1) where C denotes the strength of the given material as given in Table I. The factor of safety to be used depends upon the place where the column or strut is used, the load which comes upon it, the quality of the material, and, in a large measure, upon the value taken for C. Thrus for white oak, yellow pine, and spruce, the value C is the actual crushing-strength of full-size posts of ordinary quality: hence we need not allow a factor of safety for these greater than four. For the other woods, we should use a factor of safety of at least six. If the load upon the column or post is such as comes upon the floor of a machine-shop, or where heavy machinery is used, or if the strut is for a railway-bridge, a larger factor of safety should be used in all cases. If the quality of the timber is exceptionally good, we may use the larger values for the constant C, in the case of the last four woods given in the table. For ordinary hard pine or oak posts, multiply the area of cross-section in inches by 1000; for spruce, by 800, and for white pine, by 700 pounds. EXAMPLE I. - What is the safe load for a hard-pine post 10 by 10 inches, 12 feet long? Ans. Area of cross-section = 10 x 10 = 100 square inches; 100 × 1000 100,000 pounds. EXAMPLE II.-What is the safe load for a spruce strut 8 feet long, 6" x 8"? Ans. Area of cross-section = 48; 48 x 800 = 38,400 pounds. Strength of Wooden Posts over Twelve Diameters in Length. When the length of a post exceeds twelve times its least thickness or diameter, the post is liable to bend under the load, and hence to break under a less load than would a shorter column of the same cross-section. To deduce a formula which would make the proper allowance for the length of a column has been the aim of many engineers, but their formulæ have not been verified by actual results. Until within two or three years the formulæ of Mr. Lewis Gordon and Mr. C. Shaler Smith have been generally used by engineers, but the extensive series of tests made on the Government testing machine at Watertown, Mass., on full-size columns, show that these formulæ do not agree with the results there obtained. Mr. James H. Stanwood, Instructor in Civil Engineering, Mass. Institute Technology, in the year 1891 platted the values of all the tests made at the Watertown Arsenal up to that time on fullsize posts From the drawing thus obtained he deduced the following formula for yellow pine posts: Safe load per square inch = 1,000 - 10 x length in ins. The author has carefully compared this formula with the results of actual tests, and with other formulæ, and believes that it meets the actual conditions more nearly than any other formula, and he has therefore discarded the tables of wooden posts given in the previous editions of this work and prepared the following tables for the strength of round and square posts of sizes coming within the range of actual practice. For other sizes the loads can easily be computed by the formula. The loads for oak and white pine posts were computed by the following formulæ : in which the breadth is the least side of a rectangular strut, or the diameter of a round post. The round posts were computed for the half-inch, to allow for being turned out of a square post, of the size next larger. The formula were only used for posts exceeding 12 diameters for yellow pine, and ten diameters for other woods. For posts having bad knots, or other defects, or which are known to be eccentrically loaded, a deduction of from 10 to 25 per cent. should be made from the values given in the tables. SAFE LOAD IN POUNDS FOR YELLOW PINE POSTS (ROUND 6 x 6. 6x8. 6 x 10.. 7 Round 9 Round 10x 10.. 10 × 12. 10 × 14. 11 Round 12 x 12.... 12 x 14. 12 x 16. 14 × 14. 16 x 16. 18 × 18 20 x 20. 19,590 18,760 17,550 16,500 30,200 28.800 27.400 25.900 25,200 24,500 SAFE LOAD IN POUNDS FOR OAK AND NORWAY PINE POSTS (ROUND AND SQUARE). 6×6.. 6x8.. 6 x 10. 7 Round 8×8 8 x 12. 94 Round 11 Round 12 x 16. 20 x 20. 13,680 12,600 11,520 14,700 13,900 13,160 12,370 22,680 21,600 20,520 19,440 18,900 18,360 SAFE LOAD IN POUNDS FOR WHITE PINE AND SPRUCE POSTS (ROUND AND SQUARE). 6×6.. 6×8. 6 × 10. Round 8x8. 94 Round 19 × 10.. 10 × 12. 10 × 14. 114 Round 14 x 14... 18 × 18. 20 x 20. 11,520 10,550 9,800 8,700 19,080 18,216 17,352 16,490 16,050 15,620 90,000 90,000 79,780 78.000 77.180 76,320 74,590 72,860 69,400 |