American Law Reports Annotated, Том 10Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1919 |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-3 із 81
Сторінка 1258
... favor of one defendant and against the plaintiff was not a good counterclaim , even though the note sued on was both joint and several . See to the same effect , Jennings v . Shriver ( 1838 ) 5 Blackf . ( Ind . ) 37 ; McGuinness v ...
... favor of one defendant and against the plaintiff was not a good counterclaim , even though the note sued on was both joint and several . See to the same effect , Jennings v . Shriver ( 1838 ) 5 Blackf . ( Ind . ) 37 ; McGuinness v ...
Сторінка 1261
ther of the defendants could plead a counterclaim in his own favor . To a joint obligation of two or more defendants , no counterclaim is avail- able which consists of a demand in favor of one of them only . Thus , where a note is in ...
ther of the defendants could plead a counterclaim in his own favor . To a joint obligation of two or more defendants , no counterclaim is avail- able which consists of a demand in favor of one of them only . Thus , where a note is in ...
Сторінка 1266
... favor only is not a valid set - off . Collier v . Ervin ( 1877 ) 3 Mont . 142 . So , in an action to vacate a post- nuptial agreement and thereby remove a cloud from title to real estate , a money demand of a part of the de- fendants ...
... favor only is not a valid set - off . Collier v . Ervin ( 1877 ) 3 Mont . 142 . So , in an action to vacate a post- nuptial agreement and thereby remove a cloud from title to real estate , a money demand of a part of the de- fendants ...
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
accord and satisfaction accused acquit acter action affirmed agreement alleged amendment nunc appeal carrier cause char character charge clerical error clerk Colo consideration considered contract corporation correct County Crim crime damages decree defendant defendant's guilt dence discharge duty effect entered entitled error coram nobis evidence ex rel fact fence fendant habeas corpus injury insane instruction Iowa judgment jury land liability lis pendens Lumber marriage ment Minn misprision mistake motion N. Y. Supp negligence nunc pro tunc Okla party person plaintiff plaintiff in error proceeding proof proper question railroad reasonable doubt record refused rendered rule Stat Statute of Frauds street sufficient supra term testator testimony tion trial judge verdict Wash witnesses writ of error