American Law Reports Annotated, Том 162Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1946 |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-3 із 100
Сторінка 22
... testimony to prove the failure of the giving of crossing signals , will be found infra , IV . III . Distinction between testimony that signals were " not given , " and testimony that signals were " not seen " or " not heard , " in ...
... testimony to prove the failure of the giving of crossing signals , will be found infra , IV . III . Distinction between testimony that signals were " not given , " and testimony that signals were " not seen " or " not heard , " in ...
Сторінка 23
... testimony that the witness did not hear a cross- ing signal , and testimony that no signal was given , the court , in Dela- ware & H. Co. v . Stankus ( 1936 ; CCA 3d , from ND Pa ) 81 F2d 396 , said : " Zaller's testimony was positive ...
... testimony that the witness did not hear a cross- ing signal , and testimony that no signal was given , the court , in Dela- ware & H. Co. v . Stankus ( 1936 ; CCA 3d , from ND Pa ) 81 F2d 396 , said : " Zaller's testimony was positive ...
Сторінка 33
... testimony is of such pro- bative value as to justify a jury in giving as much , or even greater , weight to it than to positive testimony of witnesses that the signals were given if the witnesses are of equal credibility . Though a ...
... testimony is of such pro- bative value as to justify a jury in giving as much , or even greater , weight to it than to positive testimony of witnesses that the signals were given if the witnesses are of equal credibility . Though a ...
Зміст
Introduction and survey | 10 |
Distinction between testimony that signals were not given | 22 |
Comparative probative force of testimony that signals were not given | 28 |
Авторські права | |
1 інших розділів не відображаються
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
action affirmed Ann Cas annotation App Div appeal applied bell bonds child claim Conflict of Laws Constitution contract convey covenant criminal crossing signals declarations declarations against interest defendant dence disqualified effect employee enforce estoppel evidence F Supp facie fact Federal statute grantor Headnote hear heard held infra insured interest Iowa judge judgment jurisdiction jury land lease legitimate liquidated damages ment Mo App NE2d negative ness Okla opinion option overtime P. R. Co party penal penalty peremptory challenges person plaintiff positive presumption probative force provision purchase question quitclaim deed reason restraints on alienation rule against perpetuities rung signals were given sounded St Rep stat statute of limitations statutory suit supra Supreme Court SW2d testi testimony Tex Civ App tion train approached trial United validity violation whistle witness not dealt writ of certiorari York