American Law Reports Annotated, Том 162Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1946 |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-3 із 75
Сторінка 42
... listening , and three other witnesses who were not listening , heard no bell , while six railroad em- ployees testified positively that they heard the bell and that it was ring- ing ; the preponderance of the evi- dence was that the ...
... listening , and three other witnesses who were not listening , heard no bell , while six railroad em- ployees testified positively that they heard the bell and that it was ring- ing ; the preponderance of the evi- dence was that the ...
Сторінка 61
... listening for it . Although they may not have had their minds particularly centered on the specific fact as to whether the bell was rung , the whistle sounded , or a headlight was displayed , still they were listen- ing for this train ...
... listening for it . Although they may not have had their minds particularly centered on the specific fact as to whether the bell was rung , the whistle sounded , or a headlight was displayed , still they were listen- ing for this train ...
Сторінка 88
... listening for crossing signals from approaching trains but heard none . Texas & N. O. R. Co. v . Reed ( 1909 ) 54 Tex Civ App 26 , 116 SW 69 . - where a mother and her minor son were injured by a passing train as they were walking over ...
... listening for crossing signals from approaching trains but heard none . Texas & N. O. R. Co. v . Reed ( 1909 ) 54 Tex Civ App 26 , 116 SW 69 . - where a mother and her minor son were injured by a passing train as they were walking over ...
Зміст
Introduction and survey | 10 |
Distinction between testimony that signals were not given | 22 |
Comparative probative force of testimony that signals were not given | 28 |
Авторські права | |
1 інших розділів не відображаються
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
action affirmed Ann Cas annotation App Div appeal applied bell bonds child claim Conflict of Laws Constitution contract convey covenant criminal crossing signals declarations declarations against interest defendant dence disqualified effect employee enforce estoppel evidence F Supp facie fact Federal statute grantor Headnote hear heard held infra insured interest Iowa judge judgment jurisdiction jury land lease legitimate liquidated damages ment Mo App NE2d negative ness Okla opinion option overtime P. R. Co party penal penalty peremptory challenges person plaintiff positive presumption probative force provision purchase question quitclaim deed reason restraints on alienation rule against perpetuities rung signals were given sounded St Rep stat statute of limitations statutory suit supra Supreme Court SW2d testi testimony Tex Civ App tion train approached trial United validity violation whistle witness not dealt writ of certiorari York