American Law Reports Annotated, Том 162Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1946 |
З цієї книги
Результати 1-3 із 100
Сторінка 79
... crossing to sustain a finding that such signals were not given- - where one witness approaching the crossing from a distance of 100 feet , another who was 225 feet away , and a third who was guarding prison- ers 120 feet away , all ...
... crossing to sustain a finding that such signals were not given- - where one witness approaching the crossing from a distance of 100 feet , another who was 225 feet away , and a third who was guarding prison- ers 120 feet away , all ...
Сторінка 126
... crossing accident case , one of whom was 100 feet distant walking toward the crossing , another was 225 feet distant , and a third was about 120 feet distant guarding some prisoners , and the plaintiff , who was in his auto- mobile ...
... crossing accident case , one of whom was 100 feet distant walking toward the crossing , another was 225 feet distant , and a third was about 120 feet distant guarding some prisoners , and the plaintiff , who was in his auto- mobile ...
Сторінка 127
... crossing was on the crossing and gave a warning on the approach of a train . There was more than a scintilla of evidence that a flagman was not sig- naling the approach of a train where , although there was testimony that he was ...
... crossing was on the crossing and gave a warning on the approach of a train . There was more than a scintilla of evidence that a flagman was not sig- naling the approach of a train where , although there was testimony that he was ...
Зміст
Introduction and survey | 10 |
Distinction between testimony that signals were not given | 22 |
Comparative probative force of testimony that signals were not given | 28 |
Авторські права | |
1 інших розділів не відображаються
Інші видання - Показати все
Загальні терміни та фрази
action affirmed Ann Cas annotation App Div appeal applied bell bonds child claim Conflict of Laws Constitution contract convey covenant criminal crossing signals declarations declarations against interest defendant dence disqualified effect employee enforce estoppel evidence F Supp facie fact Federal statute grantor Headnote hear heard held infra insured interest Iowa judge judgment jurisdiction jury land lease legitimate liquidated damages ment Mo App NE2d negative ness Okla opinion option overtime P. R. Co party penal penalty peremptory challenges person plaintiff positive presumption probative force provision purchase question quitclaim deed reason restraints on alienation rule against perpetuities rung signals were given sounded St Rep stat statute of limitations statutory suit supra Supreme Court SW2d testi testimony Tex Civ App tion train approached trial United validity violation whistle witness not dealt writ of certiorari York