| United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1806 - 476 стор.
...the legislature, which contemplates those debtors only who are accountable for public money. Where a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature should be intended to mean what they have plainly expressed, and consequently no room is, left for... | |
| Hugh Henry Brackenridge - 1814 - 608 стор.
...the legislature, which contemplates those debtors only who are accountable for public money. Where a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature sholild be intended . to mean what they have plainly expressed, and consequently no room is left for... | |
| David James McCord, South Carolina. Constitutional Court of Appeals - 1826 - 670 стор.
...in the case of the U. States vs. Fisher, 2 Cranch 335-390, as supercedingallothers.lt is, thatwhere a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature should be intended to mean what they have plainly expressed, and consequently no room is left for construction.... | |
| Alabama. Supreme Court, George Noble Stewart - 1832 - 558 стор.
...the makers, and such construction ex viscuibus actis. The same author says in the same page, "where a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature should be intended to mean what they have plainly expressed, and consequently no room is left for construction.... | |
| Matthew Bacon, Sir Henry Gwilliam, Charles Edward Dodd - 1846 - 708 стор.
...those general expressions are to be used in a particular sense. Adams v. Wood, 2 Cranch, 341.^ {Where a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature should be intended to mean what they have plainly expressed, and consequently no room is left for construction.... | |
| Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1851 - 860 стор.
...Smith oi St. Co. Cons. 693, sec. 548. And the supreme court of the United States have held that where a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature must be intended to mean what it has plainly expressed and consequently no room is left for construction.... | |
| E. Fitch Smith - 1848 - 1004 стор.
...—from whence it might be inferred that the intent of the legislature was otherwise.(a) And where a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature should be intended to mean what they have plainly expressed ; and in such case there is no room for... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1854 - 738 стор.
...admit of any interpretation other than that which they literally import. It has been said that " where a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the legislature should be intended to mean what they have plainly expressed, and consequently, no room is left for... | |
| Theodore Sedgwick - 1857 - 770 стор.
...particular character of the statute, or to * " No principle is more firmly established, or rests on more secure foundations, than the rule which declares,...whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, that the legislature shall be intended to mean what they have plainly expressed, and consequently no... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1922 - 700 стор.
...legislature if it can be ascertained. 4. SAME — a law which is unambiguous cannot be construed. A law which is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, is not open for construction, as the legislature should be considered to have intended to mean what... | |
| |