 | 1849 - 748 стор.
...judged more correctly than the learned, and that the despised little book was really a masterpiece. Bunyan is as decidedly the first of allegorists as...of orators, or Shakespeare the first of dramatists. Other allegorists have shown equal ingenuity ; but no other allegorist has ever been able kto touch... | |
 | 1868 - 286 стор.
...most admired of them all. Lord Macaulay says that, " Bunyan is indeed as decidedly the first of all allegorists as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Shakespeare the first of dramatists." His labours however, were now drawing to a close. Returning on one occasion from London to Reading... | |
 | 1744 - 596 стор.
...judged more correctly than the learned, and that the despised little book was really a master-piece. Bunyan is as decidedly the first of allegorists as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Shakspere the first of dramatists. Other allegorists have shown equal ingenuity ; but no other allegorist... | |
 | Congregational union of England and Wales - 1848 - 684 стор.
...correctly than the learned, and that the despised little book was really a master-piece. Bunyan is, indeed, as decidedly the first of allegorists as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Snakspeare the first of dramatists. Other aJlegorists have shown equal ingenuity, but no other allegorist... | |
 | 1907 - 708 стор.
...a writer, did not show himself to be a good critic when he wrote the following : " Bunyan is indeed as decidedly the first of allegorists, as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Shakspeare the first of dramatists." Spenser is not only superior to Bunyan as an alleforist, but he... | |
 | John Angell James - 1849 - 302 стор.
...correctly than the learned, and that the despised little book was really a masterpiece. Bunyan is indeed as decidedly the first of allegorists as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Shakspear the first of dramatists. Other allegorists have shewn equal ingenuity; but no other has ever... | |
 | 1849 - 858 стор.
...than the learned, and that the despised little book was, indeed, a master-piece. Bunyau is. indeed, as decidedly the first of allegorists, as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Shakspcre the first of dramatists. Other allegorists have shown equal ingenuity; but no other allegorist... | |
 | Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay - 1849 - 660 стор.
...correctly than the learned, and that the despised little book was really a master-piece. Bunyan is indeed as decidedly the first of allegorists, as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Shakspeare the first of dramatists. Other allegorists have shown equal ingenuity, but no other allegorist... | |
 | William Tait, Christian Isobel Johnstone - 1849 - 840 стор.
...learned, and that the despised little book was really a masterpiece. Bunyan is indeed as deeidedly the first of allegorists, as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Shakspere the first of dramatists. Other allegorists hu\e shown equal ingenuity: but no other allegorist... | |
 | Samuel Dunn - 1849 - 1194 стор.
...the learned, and that the despised little book was really a masterpiece. Banyan n indeed as deoidedly the first of allegorists as Demosthenes is the first of orators, or Shnkspeare the first of dramatists. Other allegorists have shown eqnal ingenuity, but no other allegorist... | |
| |
Other allegorists have shown equal ingenuity, but no other allegorist has ever been able to touch the heart, and to make abstractions objects of terror, of pity, and of love. 
