Зображення сторінки
PDF
ePub

PERIODS OF INFLUX.

147

of money inflation, and of great activity of the societary movement, whether induced by protection, war, or increased production of gold and silver. While the magnitude of the immigration maintains a general increase in subsequent years over earlier, it more than doubles between 1826 and 1828, a period of protection; doubles again in 1832-over 1831-drops slightly in 1833 on the passage of the Compromise Tariff; rises slightly in 1834, but drops sharply in 1835; attains a great height in 1836 and '37, and again in 1842, but drops one-half in 1843; resumes its upward course in 1846; is heaviest in the periods of the Irish famine (1846-9), the revolutions in Europe, 1848, and the California gold supply, 1849 to 1854; but in 1854, in the midst of this gold supply, it drops one-half, thereby showing that the condition of industries in the United States was then very bad. In fact, from the winter of 1853-4 to the bank crisis of 1857 the manufacturing industries in the United States had been in a low, typhoid condition, owing to the causes named in our chapter on "Crises." From the highwater mark of 1854 the immigration declined, under the policy of the almost free importation of foreign goods, from 427,833 in 1854 to little more than a fourth that number in 1858-9. It sank still lower in the first two years of the war, but in the second two years it nearly resumed its former rate, but did not pass the rate of 1854 again until 1872 and 1873, which were years of marked activity in, railroad building. The following static chart shows the rate for each year on a scale of 40,000 population to the section line:

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small]

It is estimated that between the years 1820 and 1876 the immigrants arriving were, as to nationality and race, as follows:

English and Irish

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

4,527,892

2,889,235

77,299

49,793

263,994

41,417

300,259

56,874

34,717

21,498

42,401

469,450

59,569

196,891

337

Chinese.

Japanese

Officers in charge of the immigrants estimate the money brought into the United States by the immigrants for the ten years, 18501860, at £83,333,333. Prior to 1860 the sentiment of the country was in favor of immigration, and every immigrant was valued, though he brought only his muscular strength, as an accession. Since 1865 a sentiment has arisen in favor of an assorted immigration, to the exclusion of Chinese, paupers, bound laborers, gypsies, persons bringing disease, and criminals.

58.-Wasting the Land.—The opening up of new lands in America, and the denudation of timber, has been done in a way to sacrifice the largest future interests to the smallest present interests, which is the essence of waste. Dr. Franklin B. Hough, Chief of Forestry at Washington, estimates that in 1870 our entire area of remaining wood lands of every kind was 380,000,000 acres, that we were stripping the wood from 15,000,000 acres yearly, and were planting less than 10,000 acres. If these dates were correct there has been a subsequent reduction of 160,000,000 acres, leaving 220,000,000 acres standing, or enough to last twentytwo years longer. It is also estimated officially that the mills of the Northern States, if they could be planted in the South, would saw up every standing pine in Florida or Alabama in twelve months, and would require but six months more for that of Georgia or either of the Carolinas. Three hundred million dollars worth per year are being cut, of a crop which nobody is planting, not because it is not one of

LOSS OF FORESTS.

149

the most profitable of crops, but because no private individual can afford to plant an agricultural crop which he must wait twentyfive years to reap. It is estimated that our white pine and spruce supply may not last a decade. Yet it is matter of easy computation that in thirty or forty years land in most parts of the United States, if left to grow up to timber, would, without labor, produce a crop the value of which on the stump, if spread over the period, would divide to each year about as large a return as can ordinarily be got out of the land by labor.

All this points to substitution of brick, iron, straw pulp, and similar materials at an early date, for wood. Forestry associations for planting trees have been formed in Ohio and elsewhere, but no effective check on the timber waste has yet been devised. The rapid destruction of the forests, of the Appallachian chain and Adirondacks, has also lessened the beauty and value of many American streams, by causing the entire waterflow occasioned by the melting of the winter snows to pass off in destructive freshets or floods in the spring, after which the streams are nearly dry. In the Ohio and Mississippi these spring floods are becoming each year more destructive of life and property; and are suggesting as remedies either extended plans of irrigation by canal, which will draw off these extra supplies of water, or systems of dams along the rivers to retain it, or a compulsory restoration of the forests.

It is worthy of note that in China all these plans have been adopted. The fact that their river system is more nearly like ours, than that of any other country, may in time compel our legislation concerning rivers to more nearly approach theirs.

The wasteful destruction of buffalo, deer, prairie pheasants, and other game on our Western plains, and of birds of every kind, and especially singing birds in the Western States, in response to the demand for birds for ladies' hats, are forms of waste for whose avoidance legal penalties have been invoked.

In our streams and lakes the artificial propagation of fish has had the effect to partially restore the original supply.

Marked economic effects have attended the building, or failing to build, important highways in the United States, of whatever kind, where opportunity and need existed. The early topographical engineers of the country, including especially George Washington, who was an engineer by profession, foresaw that at whatever point on the Atlantic coast an outlet should be made for the products of the Mississippi and Ohio valleys, a great, probably the greatest, Atlantic seaport would arise. Virginia was at this

time far in advance of the other States, and especially of New York, as is shown by a call made by the General Government upon the States in 1781 for money. The sum to be raised was £1,666,660, and it was divided among the original thirteen States according to the supposed value of their cultivated lands, since it was to be collected, by each State, by direct tax on land. The division was as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Even in 1810 the city of New York had a population of 96,377, while Philadelphia had 96,691, Baltimore having 46,555, Boston 32,250, New Orleans 17,212, Cincinnati 2,540, and Brooklyn 4,462. It is difficult even at this day to perceive that Washington's calculation, that the metropolis of the Atlantic coast would be at Norfolk, might not have been verified by sufficient enterprise on the part of the people of Virginia. Washington urged the legislature of Virginia to build a canal connecting the Ohio River and the James or Potomac, so as to place the outlet at Norfolk. His advice was not heeded. Subsequently New York, under the leadership of DeWitt Clinton, constructed the Erie Canal, connecting Lake Erie at Buffalo with the Hudson at Albany, then a stupendous feat of State enterprise in finance and civil engineering. Until that canal was built New York city had little more than the trade of the Hudson River Valley. The building of the canal made New York the Empire State, and the city the commercial metropolis of the Union.

59. The American Railway System in Its Unproductive Infancy.-American railways have passed through the several periods (1) of infancy and feebleness, demanding State aid at every step; (2) of incipient profits and precipitate haste on the part of municipalities, counties, and adjoining owners to embark in them for the value they would give to the lands adjoining; (3) of consolidation of continuous lines and pooling of competing lines, ending finally in a condition of stability, profit, and security; (4) of severe criticism and assault on the part of shippers of freight as to the discriminations in freights and fares deemed

INFANT RAILWAYS.

151

necessary by the railways; (5) of enormous railway grants in aid of transcontinental routes of vast future importance; and, finally, (6) of the appointment of State Boards of Railway Commissioners and the recent adoption of national legislation whose effects are not yet matured.

At the outset, in the Eastern States, railroads crept feebly into being by scattered efforts, involving much individual sacrifice. Some town and county aid was given, or loaned, by subscriptions to stock and bonds. Frequently English loans were obtained of money enough to buy the rails, or sales of the iron rails were made by English rolling mills taking stock or bonds in return. In a rough way it might be said that individual enterprise bought the cars, town and county aid furnished the right of way and graded the roads, and English mills turned out rails in exchange for the bonds.

The first railroad projectors had no conception of the length of road required, and concentration of traffic essential, to make steam railways pay a profit. Many of them began with small capitals. The New York and Harlem Railway began (in 1831) with a capital of $350,000, authorized to construct a road from 23d Street to Harlem River, about five miles.

In 1826 the merchants of Baltimore, perceiving that the public works of Pennsylvania, and the Erie Canal, were attracting to Philadelphia and New York much of the tariff from the West, in which Baltimore had formerly participated, began to project a railroad which should connect that city with the Ohio, in lieu of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, which had been found to be a work of much difficulty, in consequence of the high elevations over which it had to be carried. At this date no railroad, either in Europe or America, had been constructed for the general conveyance of freight and passengers. In England an iron tramway, the Stockton and Darlington Railroad, had been constructed for carrying coal, and near Boston the Granite Branch Railroad for carrying heavy materials to tide-water. It was much mooted whether, in case railways should be adopted, horses or steam would be the better power. The Liverpool and Manchester Railway in England was, however, in course of construction, and 2,000 miles of railway were projected.

The first railroad charter, issued in the United States, was issued to the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, at the solicitation of Philip E. Thomas, president of the Mechanics' Bank of Baltimore, its chief projector. The State of Maryland voted aid to the

« НазадПродовжити »